Burma Update

News and updates on Burma

26 August 2008

 

[ReadingRoom] News on Burma - 26/8/08

  1. UN Burma envoy 'wasted his time'
  2. Suu Kyi refuses to accept food
  3. Suu Kyi refusal to meet envoy sends a strong message
  4. Myanmar gems lure buyers despite ban
  5. Authorities extort money from cyclone victims
  6. Thai PM says West uses Myanmar's Suu Kyi as political tool
  7. Burmese protests not allowed in Singapore
  8. No photo Op for Gambari
  9. The lingering disaster in Burma
  10. UN ends its relief flights from Bangkok to Burma
  11. Ethnic opposition leaders not allowed to meet UN Envoy
  12. ASEAN legislators reject Burma counterparts' request to join meetings
  13. In a five-day trip to Burma, UN Envoy spent only 20 minutes with representatives of Burma's democracy movement
  14. Junta disrobes, charges leading monk
  15. Migrants flow out of Burma as economic woes deepen
  16. Resentment simmers in Burma a year after unabated
  17. Children die in Chin state famine
  18. Voters and officials punished for 'No' votes
  19. Myanmar natural gas sales up 25 percent
  20. Junta benefits from regional economic tug-of-war
  21. Myanmar exchange scam fleeces UN


UN Burma envoy 'wasted his time'
BBC News: Mon 25 Aug 2008

Burma's main opposition party has dismissed the latest visit by UN envoy Ibrahim Gambari as a waste of time.

Nyan Win, of the National League for Democracy (NLD), said Mr Gambari had not established any dialogue between the military rulers and the opposition.

He was also annoyed that the envoy appeared to have given tacit backing to the junta's planned election in 2010.

Detained NLD leader Aung San Suu Kyi refused to meet Mr Gambari, fuelling speculation she is unhappy with the UN.

And Mr Gambari was not invited to the remote capital of Nay Pyi Taw to meet the junta's top leader, Senior General Than Shwe.

The BBC's South East Asia correspondent, Jonathan Head, says Mr Gambari now seems to have used up all the credibility he had.

After more than two years of failure his statements remain relentlessly upbeat - yet he seems to put no pressure on the generals, our correspondent says.

Consolidated power

Nyan Win expressed particular annoyance with Mr Gambari for negotiating with the generals over their "roadmap" to democracy, which plans for elections in 2010.

"We have made very clear to the UN envoy that the mission should not discuss the upcoming 2010 elections, as the NLD does not recognise the military-backed constitution," he said.

"The UN envoy was wasting his time on matters that he was not supposed to deal with."

He added that Mr Gambari had also failed to make any progress on the other major theme of his mission - to secure the release of political prisoners including Ms Suu Kyi, who is under house arrest.

During his six-day visit, Mr Gambari did hold talks with the NLD and meet Prime Minister Thein Sein - a figurehead who holds little real power.

But diplomats conceded that nothing concrete had come of his visit.

The NLD won a general election in 1990 but the junta refused to allow the party to assume power.

In recent months, the generals have further consolidated their grip on power, pushing through a constitution which reserves 25% of the seats in any future parliament for the military.

They have also extended Ms Suu Kyi's house arrest for another year. She has spent more than half of the past 20 years in detention.


Suu Kyi refuses to accept food: Exiled NLD
Irrawaddy: Mon 25 Aug 2008

Detained pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi refused to accept a food delivery to her home one week ago, according to the exiled National League for Democracy-Liberated Area. It isn't clear if she has started a hunger strike.

The exiled group released a statement on Monday saying that Suu Kyi has refused to accept food from members of her party for nine days.

However, the NLD headquarters in Rangoon has yet to confirm the news. Nyan Win, a spokesperson for the NLD, told The Irrawaddy on Monday that the party was trying to confirm the report.

Suu Kyi told an NLD member, Myint Soe, who regularly delivers her food not to bring any more after the middle of this month, according to her family lawyer, Kyi Win, who was allowed to meet her twice on August 8 and 17 to discuss legal issues surrounding her continued detention.

One senior NLD member in Rangoon also said that Suu Kyi had a plan to "cut food supplies" unless her demands to meet her lawyer for further discussions were met by the military authorities.

Suu Kyi was concerned with restrictions imposed on her by the regime, the lawyer told The Irrawaddy over the phone from Rangoon on Monday.

The lawyer explained that under restriction (a), Suu Kyi is not allowed to meet and hold talks with diplomats or political organizations. Under restriction (b), she is not allowed to leave her house.

Under these restrictions, Suu Kyi could not, according to the regime's own rules, meet Gambari or any visiting UN envoys. Kyi Win said that the way the UN officials called her to come out of her house with a loudspeaker would have forced her to violate the restrictions.

Two of Gambari's aides shouted with a bullhorn in front of Suu Kyi's house that the envoy wanted to meet her last Friday, the last scheduled day of his sixth visit to Burma for national reconciliation talks between the regime and the NLD. Gambari later added a day to his trip.

Observers said that Suu Kyi's refusal to meet the UN envoy last week showed her disappointment with his failed attempts to broker a solution to the country's decades-old political standoff.

Suu Kyi has been under house arrest for 13 of the past 19 years. During most of this time, her food has been supplied exclusively by her colleagues.

In 2003, soon after Suu Kyi's motorcade was attacked by junta-backed thugs in Upper Burma, the US State Department said that she had started a hunger strike.


Suu Kyi refusal to meet envoy sends a strong message, say observers - Saw Yan Naing
Irrawaddy: Mon 25 Aug 2008

Burmese pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi's refusal to meet with United Nations Special Envoy Ibrahim Gambari during his visit to the country last week has put a strong spotlight on the UN's failed diplomatic efforts, said observers and members of the country's opposition.

"I think she sent the message not only to Gambari but also to the UN and the Burmese people that there is no tangible consequence from the last meetings," said Win Naing, a spokesperson for the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) in Rangoon.

In a surprise move, Suu Kyi cancelled a meeting with Gambari last Wednesday and refused to meet with him again on Friday. Her refusal came amid criticism of the envoy's meetings with groups formed by the ruling junta as a means of shoring up support for a military-drafted constitution and planned elections in 2010.

But Suu Kyi was not the only person who did not want to meet Gambari on this trip. Some observers said that the refusal of Snr-Gen Than Shwe to meet the UN envoy was one of the reasons Suu Kyi declined to meet him.

"She obviously wants to send the message to the junta and to the UN that she is frustrated with the lack of progress," said Larry Jagan, a British journalist who specializes in Burmese issues, speaking to The Irrawaddy on Monday.

Meanwhile, Burma's ruling military regime moved quickly to exploit the situation. State-run television showed Gambari's aides and Burmese officials standing in front of Suu Kyi's house - one holding a loudspeaker - calling her to come out.

Information Minister Kyaw Hsan, who in a previous encounter with Gambari severely upbraided him for his supposed bias towards the pro-democracy leader, said: "We deeply regret that Daw Aung San Suu Kyi declined to meet with Your Excellency."

Many Burma watchers and Burmese groups in exile were less sympathetic. Several Burmese bloggers ridiculed Gambari's mission and UN efforts.

A Western diplomat with a keen interest in Burma said that the outcome of Gambari's trip was "quite disappointing."

"Her [Suu Kyi] tactic was clearly the result of frustration at the failure of the regime to take her and Gambari seriously," said the diplomat, noting that this was the third time that Than Shwe had failed to meet Gambari.

Although he was only supposed to meet with mid-ranking officials on this trip, the regime's prime minister, Gen Thein Sein, finally made himself available after Suu Kyi's cancellation.

Aye Thar Aung, secretary of the both Arakan League for Democracy and the Committee Representing the People's Parliament, blasted the UN envoy, calling him "just a guest of the junta."

"He is doing what the junta asked for. He is like a representative of the junta," said the Rangoon-based Arakanese politician, echoing the sentiment of some who believe that Gambari endorsed the 2010 election.

"Mr Gambari hasn't achieved any concrete result from this trip at all," said Jagan. "There is no improvement in the political situation. There was no discussion of the release of political prisoners."

"I think his mission now must be at an end," said Jagan.


Myanmar gems lure buyers despite ban
Associated Press: Mon 25 Aug 2008

YANGON, Myanmar - Thousands of sapphires, rubies, diamonds, emeralds, jade and other gems glitter in long glass display cases as merchants haggle with professional buyers - most of them foreigners - and tourists.

Business is good here at the sales center of the Myanmar Gems Museum, despite legislation signed by President George W. Bush last month to ban the import of rubies and jade into America. Yangon gem sellers dismissed the sanction against their government as a symbolic gesture unlikely to have much impact on their lucrative trade.

"Our buyers are almost all from China, Russia, the gulf, Thailand, India and the European Union, and we can barely keep up with their demand," said Theta Mar of Mandalar Jewelry, a store in the museum gem shop, where prices range from a few hundred dollars to about $18,000.

Myanmar produces up to 90 percent of the world's rubies and is a top international supplier of other gems and jade. The government-controlled sector, often criticized for harsh working conditions and poor environmental controls, is a major source of export revenue for the military.

No recent or reliable official statistics on the gemstone trade are publicly available, but analysts and human-rights groups say it likely brings the military regime $300 million to $400 million a year.

The embargo on gems is the latest U.S. move to apply financial pressure on the junta. Many Western nations have instituted economic and political sanctions against the military government, which seized power in 1988, violently suppressed pro-democracy demonstrations by monks last September and hindered foreign aid after a devastating cyclone in May.

The U.S. bill bans all import of gems from Myanmar. U.S. officials say Myanmar had been evading earlier gem-targeting sanctions by laundering the stones in third countries before they were shipped to the United States.

The United States also has been trying to persuade the UN Security Council to consider introducing international sanctions, and has demanded that the junta release opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest.

Exiled Myanmar pro-democracy activists hailed the new U.S. measure.

"This legislation sends a strong signal to Burma's military regime that the United States stands firmly on the side of my country's democracy movement," said Aung Din, co-founder of the Washington-based U.S. Campaign for Burma, which lobbies for political change.

However, the junta has not issued an official response. And local officials have privately told foreign diplomats the embargo will have no effect on the sector's foreign sales unless the wider international community joins in.

Such a move seems unlikely anytime soon. Although the European Union has edged closer to the punitive U.S. position toward Myanmar's military rulers, Yangon's regional trading partners - China, India and members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations - have argued that engaging the junta will be more productive in the long run than isolating it through sanctions.

The junta holds regular gem auctions for foreign merchants during which it sells thousands of lots of valuable stones, which are said to generate upward of $100 million in foreign currency per sale. The last such event, held in November, drew more than 3,600 foreign buyers.


Authorities extort money from cyclone victims
Democratic Voice of Burma: Mon 25 Aug 2008

Villagers in Irrawaddy division have complained that local authorities have continued to extort money from cyclone victims under various pretexts, despite a letter of complaint they sent to SPDC leaders to report the practice.

U Than Zin, chairman of Mangay Kalay village Peace and Development Council in Dadaye township, PDC members and U Khin Kyaw (also known as U Htin Kyaw) of the township land survey department extorted money from villagers for receiving aid from donors.

U Ba Kyi, a farmer from Mangay Kalay, said locals had been forced to pay for diesel fuel that had been donated to them.

"There were 1383 gallons of diesel, and they collected 500 kyat a gallon from us – so 919,000 kyat," U Ba Kyi said.

"But these were actually given to us as donations."

U Ba Kyi said each household was also told to pay money to help cyclone victims.

"They collected 500 kyat each from 432 families on the pretext of helping the storm victims," he said.

"We had to pay 216,000 each time and we had to pay four times, totaling around 864,000."

The authorities reportedly told villagers they needed to collect money to fund the accommodation and hospitality for donors.

"Not satisfied with that, they collected 8000 kyat each from 212 farmers in order to buy fertiliser from the state agricultural organisation – 742 bags of fertilizers – amounting to exactly 1,696,000," U Ba Kyi said.

"They have been misappropriating the money they have collected."

The villagers sent their letter of complaint, which they had each signed and given their national identity card number, to junta leader senior general Than Shwe, prime minister general Thein Sein, the social and relocation minister and hotel and tourism minister, and the commander of Western Command, but no action has so far been taken by the authorities.

Similarly in Talokehtaw village in Rangoon division's Twante township, the village authority chairman and members of the Union Solidarity and Development Association and the Women's Affairs Federation have been profiting from aid, a villager told DVB.

"In Twante's Talokehtaw village, when they're distributing rice or medicine, there have been incidents when they have failed to give out the aid or extorted money," the villager said.

The villager said that goods had mainly been distributed to people who supported the authorities, while others had to pay to receive materials.

"One day, they gave things out using a raffle ticket system, but each house had to pay 300 kyat to enter the raffle," the villager said.

"Even if you won something you had to pay 1500 kyat [to receive it]," he said.

"U Maung Thaung, U Aye Thaung and Daw Cho are the main people involved in that."


Thai PM says West uses Myanmar's Suu Kyi as political tool
Agence France Presse: Mon 25 Aug 2008

Thailand's prime minister on Monday criticised Western nations for pinning their efforts to bring democracy to Myanmar on the release of detained opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

Samak Sundaravej met Ibrahim Gambari, the UN's top envoy to Myanmar, on Monday and told the diplomat that efforts to engage the military regime would be more productive if the Nobel peace prize winner was left off the agenda.

"Europe uses Aung San Suu Kyi as a tool. If it's not related to Aung San Suu Kyi, you can have deeper discussions with Myanmar," he told reporters after the Bangkok meeting.

"Aung San Suu Kyi is one thing. The (international community) should talk about how to bring democracy in Myanmar and focus on the constitution and the elections," he added.

Samak said he would relay that message in a meeting with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in New York next month.

Gambari left Myanmar on Saturday after failing to secure a meeting with Aung San Suu Kyi, who has been under house arrest for most of the last 19 years.

Her National League for Democracy (NLD) party has branded the UN visit a "waste of time".

Aung San Suu Kyi led the NLD to a landslide election victory in 1990, but was never allowed to govern.

The regime instead unveiled its own "road map" to democracy and drafted a new constitution, which was approved in a much-criticised referendum in May.

The junta says the charter will set the stage for elections in 2010, but the pro-democracy movement say the process simply enshrines the army's position in the nation it has ruled since 1962.

Samak said that as the current chair of regional bloc the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Thailand would try to persuade the junta to allow observers at the promised election.


Burmese protests not allowed in Singapore - Min Lwin
Irrawaddy: Mon 25 Aug 2008

Myo Tun, one of three Burmese activists who took part in political activities in Singapore, says "Now I have no future." He is among three activists who were ordered to leave Singapore for demonstrating against the junta.

On August 2, the Singapore government declined to renew visas permits or extensions for Myo Tun and two other Burmese activists for participating in public protests illegally.

Public demonstrations are not allowed in Singapore without a police permit.

In addition to Myo Tun, Soe Thiha and Hlaing Moe were also forced to leave the country. Myo Tun had resided in Singapore for nine years.

The activists were part of a larger group of people who demonstrated against the Burmese junta in November 2007 during the Asean Summit meeting in Singapore.

"I didn't break any of Singapore's criminal laws," Myo Tun said. "The Singapore government's treatment of us was unjustified."

Myo Tun, 38, was jailed three times in Burma as a political prisoner following the 1988 pro-democracy uprising. "It is apparent the Singapore authorities wanted to punish Burmese activists for working for democracy in Burma," he said.

Burmese activists who are long-time residents of Singapore stepped up their pro-democracy activities following the September 2007 uprising.

In April and May of this year, activists staged demonstrations in front of the Burmese embassy in Singapore against the new constitution.

Hlaing Moe, a part-time student who is now living in Malaysia, said Burmese activists did not commit any crimes against Singaporean law.

"The Singapore Immigration and Checkpoint Authorities didn't give any reason or explanation for rejecting the renewals or extensions of our visas and permits," he said.

Kyaw Soe, a member of the Overseas Burmese Patriots (OBP), a group of about 50 Burmese activists, said nine other activists, all permanent residents of Singapore, who participated in public protests in November are not sure their future.

"The Singapore government forced me to leave Singapore as quickly as possible," Kyaw Soe told The Irrawaddy on Monday.

Meanwhile, The Strait Times newspaper reported on Saturday that Singapore's Ministry of Home Affairs has warned Burmese political activists not to ignore repeated police orders to stop illegal public protests and anti-Burma activities.

A ministry spokesperson said that the right of a foreign national to work or stay in Singapore is not a matter of entitlement or a right to be secured by political demand and public pressure, and the activists repeatedly ignored requests from government officials to meet to discuss the group's conduct, according to the newspaper.

A spokesperson singled out the OBP which he said "has chosen to [conduct demonstrations] in open and in persistent defiance of our laws."


No photo Op for Gambari - Marwaan Macan-Markar
Inter Press Service: Mon 25 Aug 2008

A United Nations-led effort to push political reform in military-ruled Burma plunged to a humiliating low on the weekend, raising questions about the effectiveness of the world body's special envoy to the country, Ibrahim Gambari.

This shift was conveyed in the way Aung San Suu Kyi, the detained pro-democracy leader, treated Gambari during his six-day mission, which ended on Aug. 23. She refused to see him on at least two occasions. It was a silence of Gandhian proportions for the Nobel Peace laureate and, for the U.N. envoy, an unprecedented snub.

Deprived, as a result, was the photo opportunity that Gambari had used after his three previous visits to Burma, over the past year, to give the impression that he was making headway with Suu Kyi in paving the road for political reform. The images of the Nigerian diplomat posing with the 63-year-old Suu Kyi, who has spent over 13 of the past 18 years under house arrest, suggested she had confidence in the U.N.

But a scene outside the Rangoon home of Suu Kyi on Friday morning confirmed that Gambari's luck had run out. The leader of the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) party refused to open the gates of her rambling colonial mansion to two of Gambari's representatives who had come to invite her for a meeting, after she had turned down an invitation at a state guest house 48 hours before.

"On Friday morning, two of Gambari aides were seen by neighbours outside the gate of Suu Kyi's residence, shouting Gambari's name. They left when nobody came out to meet them," reported 'The Irrawaddy', a current affairs magazine run by Burmese journalists in exile, quoting the Associated Press news agency.

Gambari also left the South-east Asian nation without another possible photograph that may have suggested progress.

It was the second time that Gambari had been denied an audience with the military leader Senior Gen. Than Shwe, who holds all the power in Burma.

"Mr. Gambari had always exploited the photo opportunity he had with Daw Suu Kyi to give the impression that the political dialogue process that he was leading for the U.N. was working," says Zin Linn, a spokesman for the National Coalition Government for the Union of Burma (NCGUB), the democratically elected Burmese government forced into exile by the junta.

"But this time there was no photo. She has sent a strong message to the Burmese people by refusing to meet Mr. Gambari," Zin Linn explained in an interview. "She wants the people to know that they cannot rely on the U.N. to bring results. They have to stand up on their own feet."

Other Burma watchers are as scathing. "Unlike Gambari, Aung San Suu Kyi refuses to be a pawn in the junta's game," says Debbie Stothard of ALTSEAN, a regional body campaigning for human rights in Burma. "This confirms that she has lost confidence in Gambari. She has said so through the only peaceful form of resistance available to her."

Gambari's failure should "be a wakeup call to the Security Council's members that they can no longer be conned by the junta," Stothard told IPS. "Most of the key decisions makers at the U.N. used Gambari's shuttle diplomacy as an excuse not to act on Burma. But nothing has moved, and now there is little left to hope for."

The world body, however, had different hopes when it sent Gambari to Burma last year. That followed the international outrage at the junta's harsh crackdown of peaceful street demonstrations, led by tens of thousands of Buddhist monks, on the streets of Rangoon last September. It was Gambari's third visit as a special political envoy.

The initial visit appeared to have made some headway, since Gambari met Than Shwe and Suu Kyi and succeeded in getting the junta to appoint a minister to be a liaison officer to conduct talks with Suu Kyi. That U.N. mission fed a view that the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), as the junta is officially known, was receptive to some change and genuine reform.

But as 2007 drew to a close, the junta began to flex its political muscle and reneged on some of the pledges made to the U.N. envoy as part of the "roadmap" toward democracy. The junta's old language that it would stick to its seven-point plan to impose a "discipline-flourishing" democracy - rather than an open and inclusive one that was part of the reform agenda - gained ground.

By mid-March, when Gambari returned to Burma for his third visit, he was given a hostile reception by the junta. The information minister, Brig. Gen. Kyaw Hsan, told the envoy that the SPDC would not accommodate a U.N. request to amend the country's draft constitution, enabling legitimate political participation by the opposition, including Suu Kyi.

The SPDC stood firm in May, pushing ahead with a referendum fraught with abuse and vote rigging to approve the new constitution, a week after Burma was devastated by powerful Cyclone Nargis which killed tens of thousands. It was a key step in the junta's march toward achieving political legitimacy at the 2010 general elections.

But for the Burmese opposition, the events in May only held out the possibility of further oppression in a country that has been under the grip of the military since March 1962. It has also crushed the hopes of opposition leaders who won seats at the 1990 parliamentary elections - in which the NLD won a thumping majority that the junta refused to recognise.

"Mr. Gambari has let the junta get its way by supporting their agenda [rather] than offering a political roadmap of his own," says Zin Linn of the NCGUB. "We are not surprised by his failure."


The lingering disaster in Burma
Cutting Edge News Asia Desk: Mon 25 Aug 2008

Reign of terror in Burma requires genuine U.N. action - not just official visits - Benedict Rogers

On July 27, Nhkum Hkawn Din, a 15 year-old school girl in Kachin State, northern Burma, was brutally gang-raped and then murdered by Burma Army soldiers. Her skull was crushed beyond recognition, her eyes gouged out, her throat cut, she was stabbed in her right rib cage and stomach, and all her facial features were obliterated. Her body was found after a three-day search, naked and mutilated, 200 meters from an army checkpoint near Nam Sai village, Bamaw District. She was on her way to bring rice to her brother.

Against this backdrop, UN special envoy Ibrahim Gambari has just completed another visit to Burma last week for more talks with the country's brutal, illegitimate military regime. But instead of taking the regime to task for human rights violations, he spent two days talking with the regime and its cronies, and just twenty minutes with the leaders of Burma's democracy movement, the National League for Democracy (NLD). Even though his previous visits have yielded no change in the junta's behavior, and Burma's human rights record continues to deteriorate, Gambari rejected calls from activists to drop the diplomatic niceties and photo-calls and set out unambiguously the requirements for change.

Instead he spent time talking with groups such as the Union of Myanmar Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (UMFCCI), the major funder of the regime's brutal proxy militia group "Swan-Arr-Shin". This group led the regime's efforts in attacking and killing peaceful monks and democracy activists during and after last September's Saffron Revolution. According to the US Campaign for Burma, Gambari also met with the Union Solidarity and Development Association, a group comparable to Hitler's "Brown Shirts," that carried out an assassination attempt on Nobel Peace Prize recipient Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in May 2003. During that attack dozens of her party members were killed. Also on his schedule was a meeting with the National Unity Party, the military-backed political party that lost severely to the NLD in 1990 elections - gaining only 10 out of 485 seats in parliament.

Since 1990, there have been 37 visits by UN envoys to Burma – yet the crisis in the country has worsened in that time. More than 30 resolutions have been passed by the UN Human Rights Council and General Assembly, and the Security Council has held past two presidential statements, with little effect. Vague, timeless requests to the junta to engage in dialogue with democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi have led nowhere. She has spent more than 12 years under house arrest, and her detention has been extended again. Earlier this year the regime said she deserved to be "flogged". The Generals are not people who are persuaded at cocktail parties.

Gambari's efforts have clearly failed. Now, activists say, it is time for the UN to set out some specific benchmarks for progress for the junta, accompanied by deadlines. The first benchmark should be the release of political prisoners, who currently number over 2,000. Many are in extremely poor health due to bad prison conditions, mistreatment, torture and the denial of medical care. In the past 20 years, 137 have died in custody. This year alone, there have been 267 arbitrary arrests. The UN should insist that the Generals release political prisoners before Ban Ki-moon's visit to Burma in December.

Further benchmarks should follow – such as an end to the military offensive against civilians in eastern Burma which has destroyed 3,200 villages and displaced more than a million people since 1996, and an end to the culture of impunity and the systematic and widespread use of rape as a weapon of war against ethnic nationalities in Burma. Over a thousand cases of rape have been documented in Burma's ethnic areas, and many more go unreported. The pattern is nationwide – Kachin, Chin, Shan, Karen, Karenni and Mon women's organisations have all documented cases. Last year four schoolgirls in Kachin state were gang-raped by Burma Army soldiers – and then arrested and charged with prostitution when they reported it. The UN Security Council has recognized rape and sexual violence as a crime against humanity in Resolution 1820 passed on 19 June this year – something Mr. Gambari should have reminded the Generals this week.

Setting benchmarks, with realistic deadlines, would enable Mr Gambari – if he is kept in his post - to evaluate, incrementally, the progress – or lack thereof – that he is making. If the junta complies, so much the better. But if it continues with its policies of ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, bold action should be taken.

A universal arms embargo should be imposed through the Security Council – and maximum pressure placed on China and Russia not to use their veto. Major financial centres such as Tokyo, Hong Kong and Singapore, as well as the European Union, should impose carefully targeted financial sanctions against the Generals' personal assets and investments. And the international community should stop the diplomatic charade and call the Generals by name for what they are: criminals. The prosecution of Sudan's leader Omar al-Bashir and the capture of Radovan Karadzic have set a precedent. Burma's Generals are guilty of every imaginable crime against humanity, and should be brought to account in the International Criminal Court or through another jurisdiction.

The regime's credentials to represent Burma in the UN should also be challenged. The junta has no legitimacy, having overwhelmingly lost elections in 1990, manifestly rigged a referendum on a new constitution earlier this year, and proven itself criminally negligent in its handling of Cyclone Nargis. The junta ignored 41 warnings about the approaching cyclone, initially rejected international offers of aid and then restricted, obstructed and diverted relief. According to the UN, over a million cyclone victims have still not received help. At least 2.5 million are still homeless and over 140,000 dead. And now the UN says the regime has been stealing millions of dollars of aid money through its below-market fixed exchange rates. Burma is the world's second major opium producer and a leading producer of amphetamines – and the regime is knee-deep in drugs. The junta is unfit to govern, and there is a legitimate alternative in the form of those elected in 1990 now living as a government in exile.

These may seem drastic measures, but the situation is dire. The regime has destroyed twice as many ethnic villages as in Darfur, civilians are shot at point-blank range, and forced labour, torture and the use of human minesweepers is widespread. Burma has the highest number of forcibly conscripted child soldiers in the world. It is widely believed that one reason the regime denied aid to some cyclone victims was because they were Karen. The regime has been conducting a campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Karen for decades, and it may have used a natural disaster to assist in its efforts.

Last week, two Members of Parliament elected in 1990 were arrested for signing a letter to Ban Ki-moon. Several other signatories went into hiding. The letter refers to the Secretary-General's strong stand on Zimbabwe: "We applaud the courage of the Secretary-General and his expression of moral authority … We expect [the] Secretary-General [to] also stand for the rights of the people of Burma, who were unable to express their real aspirations in the referendum." It continues: "At the very least, we don't want the United Nations siding with the dictators, and forcing the people of Burma into an untenable position."

The UN should not just call for the release of those arrested last week – Ban Ki-moon and Gambari should read their letter carefully. They should warn the Generals that if they do not change, calls for such action will grow louder, and pressure on Burma's protectors – China, India, Thailand and the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) – will only grow stronger. The status quo is unsustainable, and Gambari's record is a failure. Both he and the junta need to change their act.

Benedict Rogers is the author of A Land Without Evil: Stopping the Genocide of Burma's Karen People (Monarch, 2004), and has visited Burma and its borderlands more than 20 times. He also serves as Deputy Chairman of the UK Conservative Party's Human Rights Commission.


UN ends its relief flights from Bangkok to Burma - Violet Cho
Irrawaddy: Fri 22 Aug 2008

The final UN relief supply flight for Burma took off from Bangkok's Don Mueang International Airport on Friday - the last of more than 230 operated by the UN's World Food Programme following Cyclone Nargis in May.

Don Mueang became a major staging post in the massive international relief effort that followed the cyclone. "The air hub was critical for the provision of vital relief supplies to the people of Myanmar [Burma]," said Tony Banbury, WFP's Asia regional director.

The WFP planes took nearly 4,000 tonnes of relief supplies to Burma, including building material, medicine, mosquito nets and water purification equipment. The 20,000 square meter warehouse at the airport used to store the supplies will also now be closed.

The WFP said international humanitarian organizations will continue to supply food, medical supplies and relief equipment to the affected Irrawaddy delta areas. Nearly 28,000 tonnes of food have so far been delivered to more than 700,000 people in the region.

Despite the continuing relief effort, refugees are still arriving in urban areas looking for food and work.

"We do not have food in our villages," said a refugee from Dadeye Township, Irrawaddy Division. "We cannot resume our work, like fishing and farming, so we have to seek help from others."


Ethnic opposition leaders not allowed to meet UN Envoy
Independent Mon News Agency: Fri 22 Aug 2008

Ethnic opposition party leaders have not been allowed to meet United Nations special envoy, Mr. Ibrahim Gambari who is in Burma on a five-day visit, though ethnic leaders demanded a meeting.

Twelve ethnic opposition leaders from the UNLD sent a letter to the Burmese government authorities and the UN office in Rangoon for a meeting with the envoy.

"We are not allowed to meet him. The junta only invited the envoy to meet ethnic political parties who would support its election," said Nai Ngwe Thein, Vice Chairman of Mon National Democratic Front (MNDF).

"However we sent a letter to UN about our stand on the elections," he added.

Twelve ethnic opposition parties, who won some seats in the 1990 elections demanded that the UN recognize the 1990 elections and not to recognize the May 10 referendum. They would boycott the coming election like the National League for Democracy (NLD).

The Zomi National Congress, the Chin National League for Democracy, the Mon National Democratic Front, the Arakan League for Democracy, the Karen National Congress for Democracy, the Kachin State National Congress for Democracy, and the Kayah State all Nationalities League for Democracy and four other ethnic parties made the demand during UN Special Human Rights Rapporteur Tomás Ojea Quintana's visit to Burma in the first week of August.

However they were not allowed a meeting and were interrogated by the special branch of the police.

The regime arranged for the UN envoy to meet representatives of Union Pa-O National Organization, National Unity Party and a Karen ceasefire group which support the government's election plans.

The junta, however, arranged the UN envoy's meeting with the NLD for a short while but has not yet allowed a meeting with pro-democracy leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi who is under the house arrest for more than 12 years.


ASEAN legislators reject Burma counterparts' request to join meetings
Kyodo News Service: Fri 22 Aug 2008

Legislators from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations on Friday rejected a request by a group of Myanmar parliamentarians-in-exile to be allowed to take part in their annual meetings as members or at least as special observers.

The ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly, which brings together legislators from the 10 ASEAN member countries, turned down the request made by the Myanmar parliamentarians' group known as the Members of Parliament Union on grounds that Myanmar is already represented in the assembly, albeit by the country's junta.

"Our concern was a technical one - we cannot admit another body," said Abdullah Tarmugi, speaker of Singapore's Parliament, who is also the assembly's current chair.

"But there was great empathy for the plight of the Myanmarese and we urged the Myanmar government to quicken the pace towards democratization and reconciliation," he said.

In the absence of a functioning parliament, Myanmar's military government has special observer status in the ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly, which was established in 1971.

Myanmar's delegation to the body's 29th General Assembly here was led by Deputy Attorney General Tun Shin, who Tarmugi said objected to the MPU's request for representation.

A joint communique issued at the end of the meeting said the assembly's Executive Committee "decided that it will not be able to accede to the request at this juncture given that consensus could not be reached on the admission of the MPU."

The MPU was formed in 1996 by parliamentarians who were elected in 1990 but are now in exile. The election then was won by Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy, by an overwhelming majority, but the junta refused to honour the results.

MPU members, calling themselves the legitimate parliamentarians of Myanmar, want their fellow parliamentarians in ASEAN to allow their participation in the inter-parliamentary assembly as a sign of solidarity with the movement for democracy in Myanmar.

More than 300 ASEAN parliamentarians attended the meeting, which also discussed issues such as food security and environmental sustainability.

The next general assembly will be held in August 2009 in Thailand.

ASEAN groups Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.


In a five-day trip to Burma, UN Envoy spent only 20 minutes with representatives of Burma's democracy movement
U.S. Campaign for Burma: Thu 21 Aug 2008

Envoy Ignores Most Democracy Groups, Makes Meeting with Aung San Suu Kyi Virtually Impossible

Contact: Aung Din (202) 234-8022

(Washington, DC and New York) According to informed sources inside Burma (also known as Myanmar); on Wednesday, August 20th the United Nations "seriously misrepresented" its mission to Burma led by the Secretary-General's Special Envoy Mr. Ibrahim Gambari.

The misrepresentation offers a rare window into the reasons that the UN Secretary-General's special envoy to Burma has failed to make any progress despite a sizeable budget, the backing of the Secretary-General, and numerous trips to the country.

According to a release issued by the UN press office in New York on August 20th, the special envoy Mr. Gambari, whose mission is to facilitate a meaningful and time-bound political dialogue between the Burmese military regime, the National League for Democracy, and the representatives of ethnic political parties, held "10 separate meetings with political parties and civil society groups, including members of the Central Executive Committee of the National League for Democracy, student representatives and elected individuals from the 1990 elections."

This statement is not only misleading but patently false - Gambari did not meet with "political parties and civil society groups," With the exception of the NLD. Instead, the UN Envoy met with nine Burmese groups, all of which are supporters and proxies of Burma's military regime.

For example, Gambari met with the Union of Myanmar Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (UMFCCI), the major funder of the regime's brutal militia "Swan-Arr-Shin". This group led the regime's efforts in attacking and killing peaceful monks and democracy activists during and after last September's Saffron Revolution. Gambari also met with the notorious Union Solidarity and Development Association, a group comparable to Hitler's "Brown Shirts," that carried out an assassination attempt on Nobel Peace Prize recipient Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in May 2003. During that attack dozens of her party members were killed. Gambari also met with the National Unity Party, the military-backed political party that lost severely to the NLD in 1990 elections - gaining only 10 out of 485 seats in parliament. He also met with the 88 Generation Students and Youth, another pro-junta group, which had campaigned to support the regime's constitution. This group is not related to the major dissident group, the "88 Generation Students"; instead, it is a front group formed by the regime to counter the activities of real student activists.

During the first four days of his five-day trip, Gambari appears to have spent most of his time meeting and dining with low level officials of the regime and pro-regime groups, with the exception of three hours of meetings with the UN Country Team, foreign diplomats and ICRC officials, while spending only 20 minutes with Central Executive Committee Members of the NLD on August 20, 2008, from 3:00 to 3:20 PM.

"How can Gambari achieve anything when he allows the Burmese regime to dictate his schedule and spends only 20 minutes with pro-democracy groups?" said Jeremy Woodrum, co-founder of the U.S. Campaign for Burma. "Even in this rare 20-minute meeting, Gambari urged NLD leaders to participate in a sham 2010 election that guarantees all key government ministries to the military. The Burmese democracy movement is losing its trust in him and the United Nations," continued Woodrum. "Because Gambari has kowtowed to the regime on his schedule, he was even unable to meet Aung San Suu Kyi, because she had made a simple request that she meet with Gambari and her political party members at the same time."

In contrast, Gambari did not meet with Burma's most influential opposition groups, including:

1) All Burma Monks' Alliance (ABMA), a powerful organization of young Buddhist monks which led peaceful protests in September of last year. Many leaders of ABMA, including Ashin Gambira, are now in prison, sentenced to death.

2) 88 Generation Student Group, prominent dissident group comprised of former student leaders who have spent 10 to 16 years in prison for their belief in democracy and human rights. Many leaders of the group, such as prominent figure Min Ko Naing, Ko Ko Gyi, Pyone Cho, Mya Aye and Htay Kywe, are in prison.

3) The Shan Nationalities League for Democracy (SNLD), a major ethnic political party that won the second largest seats in the Parliament in the 1990 election. Its leaders Hkun Htun Oo and Sai Nyunt Lwin are in prison.

4) The Committee Representing the People's Parliament, a group of parliamentarians that represent Burma's last democratically elected parliament.

5) A key group of 92 members of parliament-elect, who have sent letters to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and UN Security Council, among them, two, U Nyi Pu and Dr. Tin Min Htut, were recently arrested. Others important figures - U Pu Chin Sian Thang, U Thein Pe and Dr. Myint Naing - are available in Rangoon but have not been contacted by Gambari.##

For More Information, Contact:

U.S. Campaign for Burma
1444 N St, NW Suite A2
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 234-8022
(202) 234-8044 fax
www.uscampaignforburma.org 


Junta disrobes, charges leading monk - Wai Moe
Irrawaddy: Thu 21 Aug 2008

The leader of the All Burma Monks' Alliance (ABMA), Ashin Gambira, has been disrobed by the authorities and charged with multiple criminal offenses in the aftermath of the 2007 uprising.

His lawyer, Aung Thein, told The Irrawaddy on Wednesday that Gambira told him the authorities disrobed him after his arrest in November 2007 without following traditional procedures or consulting relevant monks' organizations.

"Ashin Gambira said the authorities, under Buddhist rules, had no right to disrobe him or to charge him with criminal offenses," said Aung Thein.

The ABMA was a key organization behind the 2007 nationwide uprising.

Gambira appeared in court on Wednesday in Insein Prison with three other monks and five citizens, all of who face multiple charges under State Offence Act 505 A or B, Immigration Act 13/1, Illegal Organization Act 17/1, Electronic Act 303 A and Organization Act 6.

His lawyer said the charges have to do with immigration laws, contacting banned organizations, illegal contacts with foreign organizations through the Internet and other offenses.

The next court date for Gambari and his colleagues was set for August 27, said Aung Thein.

Since 1962, many monks have been arrested and charged with criminal offenses, say people familiar with the military government.

Burmese monks, often joined by students and laborers, have been leaders in many demonstrations protesting military rule. Monks were in the vanguard of the 2007 uprising in which hundreds of thousands of people across the country staged demonstrations in the largest mass uprising since 1988.

The regime is also believed to have killed monks, hundreds of whom remain in prison or are still missing.

The Burmese junta officially supports Theravada Buddhism and has banned other forms of Buddhism.

"During British colonial rule, some monks were arrested for their political activities and imprisoned, but they were never disrobed by the colonizers," said Bo Kyi, joint-secretary of the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners-Burma, which has offices in Thailand.

"Under the junta, many monks have been arrested and disrobed for their conscientious objection. on this basis alone, the junta's Buddhist faith is called into question," he said.


Migrants flow out of Burma as economic woes deepen - Lawi Weng
Irrawaddy: Thu 21 Aug 2008

Burma's economic troubles have been a boon to human traffickers in recent months, keeping them busy at a time of year when wet conditions traditionally slow the flow of migrants across the border into Thailand.

A source who is involved in smuggling migrant workers from Burma to Thailand estimated that about 300 Burmese migrants are illegally transported to Bangkok each day from border areas such as Mae Sot, Three Pagodas Pass, Mae Sai and Ranong.

The most popular crossing point is Mae Sot, which is separated from the neighboring Burmese town of Myawaddy by the Moei River. Burmese routinely cross the river, either over the Thai-Burma Friendship Bridge, which links the two towns, or on inflated inner tubes.

According to the source, who is based in Mae Sot, about 150 people are smuggled from Mae Sot to Bangkok every day.

Three Pagodas Pass, near the Thai town of Sangkhlaburi, is another major point of entry, with around 60 Burmese migrants leaving the area for Bangkok daily, according to local businessman Nai Lawi Mon.

Some local observers suggested that the steady influx was due to the impact of Cyclone Nargis, which slammed into Burma's largely agricultural Irrawaddy delta on May 2-3, destroying cropland and leaving many farmers without any means of making a living.

"Normally, very few people come to Thailand during the rainy season," said Nai Lawi Mon. "But this year we are seeing more and more people coming."

Cyclone Nargis hit Burma at a time when inflation and unemployment were already at their highest levels in years, forcing a growing number of Burmese to flee to neighboring countries in search of work.

It is estimated that there are more than a million Burmese migrants living and working in Thailand, of whom around 500,000 are registered with the Thai Ministry of Labor.

The perils of their journey were highlighted in April, when 54 Burmese migrants suffocated to death while being transported in a container truck from Ranong, near the Burmese border town of Kawthaung, to the Thai resort island of Phuket.

Although the tragedy prompted officials to step up efforts to stem the tide of illegal migrants into Thailand, Burmese continue to make the trip in a desperate bid to find jobs to support themselves and their families.

Many end up in Mahachai, home to the highest concentration of Burmese migrant workers in Thailand. Located a short distance from Bangkok, Mahachai attracts thousands of Burmese with low-paying jobs in the fish processing industry that are shunned by most Thais.

Mi Wot arrived in Mahachai a week ago and is still looking for work. She said she paid 460,000 kyat (US $383) for the trip. She made the journey, her first into Thailand, with ten other people, hiding in the back of a truck under a tarpaulin for three nights. The trip took so long, she explained, because of the numerous checkpoints along the way.

While Thai efforts seem to be doing little to prevent illegal migration into the country, the Burmese authorities have been carrying out a crackdown on their side of the border that appears to be having some effect, at least for now.

According to Maung Tu, a local businessman in Kawthaung, the human traffic into the neighboring Thai province of Ranong has slowed perceptibly in recent weeks.

Normally, several hundred people cross into Thailand each day; at the moment, the flow has been reduced to a trickle of around 30-50 people a day, according to sources in the area. Similar numbers have been reported in Mae Sai, near the Burmese town of Tachilek.

Meanwhile, the cost of smuggling migrants from Mae Sot to Bangkok has increased by about 2,000 Baht ($58) recently. It now costs 14,000 Baht ($412) make the trip to the Thai capital, sources said.


Resentment simmers in Burma a year after unabated
Mizzima News: Wed 20 Aug 2008

The unabated crackdown by the military junta notwithstanding, resentment against the regime is not likely to diminish, activists and opposition forces inside Burma said on Tuesday.

Members of Burma's main opposition party – the National League for Democracy - students and activists said on the first anniversary of the Saffron Revolution against the sudden fuel price hike and soaring essential commodity prices, that resentment is ever increasing despite the junta's brutal crackdown.

"The discontent and resentment among people simmers. People are dissatisfied with the current situation," Nyan Win, spokesman of the NLD said.

Aung Moe Hein, an activist operating secretly in Rangoon, said, "The resentment against oppression by the junta boils in the heart and soul of each person. We are determined to continue our struggle till victory is achieved."

Nyan Win said, the violent crackdown by the ruling junta on protesters cannot resolve the current economic crisis. It is akin to wrong treatment for a severely ill patient.

"This treatment cannot cure the root cause of the disease. They should not arrest individuals. They should strive for the betterment and development of the economy to stem unrests," he said.

On August 19, 2007, several 88 Generation Students including Min Ko Naing led a peaceful protest march in solidarity with poor people who were hardest hit by the sudden fuel price hike that caused prices of basic commodities to escalate.

However, the regime deploying its puppet civilian organizations – the Union Solidarity and Development Association and Swan Arrshin – cracked down on sporadic protests that started since August 19, 2007.

The regime reacted swiftly crushing protests by arresting 13 of the key 88 generation student leaders including Min Ko Naing during a midnight raid on August 21.

Despite the junta's attempt to put down the protests, the discontent of the people eventually snowballed when the peaceful protests were joined by Buddhist monks. It inflamed further when Burmese Army troops harshly cracked down on protesting monks in the central Burmese town of Pakokku.

This led to the monks calling for a nation-wide boycott of the ruling junta and ignited what was to be known later as the 'Saffron Revolution'.

But the junta, which has a history of brutality in dealing with public protests, violently cracked down on protesting monks and civilians, by opening fire on the marching crowds on September 26, 2007.

While the United Nations has gone on record as saying that the junta killed at least 30 people, opposition parties and observers said more than 200 were killed while over 6,000 people were detained.

Activists said, despite a year having gone by, the junta continues to arrest activists and protesters and keeps a close watch on activists and politicians.

"I can see a lot of people around my house keeping watch over my movement. There are about three or four people keeping vigil round the clock near my house including at bus stops," a woman member of the 88 Generation Students said.

A NLD Youth member who took part in the 1988 popular uprising and 2007 September protests told Mizzima that they live under constant fear and anxiety over their safety. He said that they could be arrested by the junta any time, anywhere.

"Whenever I wake up, I wonder whether I will still see my friend whom I talked to yesterday or whether he will be arrested. I also fear whether it will be my friends or me who will be arrested first. I am in constant fear wondering when they will come and arrest me," he said.

Despite the junta's unabated efforts to arrest and search for activists, those including NLD youth members and 88 Generation Students said the crackdown will not break their spirit and will not stop their activities. They would continue their struggle for change.

"We are making sacrifices for the Burmese people. We will continue our struggle to achieve the goal of democracy and restoration of human rights. This is our task. To arrest us is their task," Aung Moe Hein said.

"We shall win one day. I firmly hope and believe that the people standing and fighting for truth and justice shall someday prevail," he added.


Children die in Chin state famine – Saw Yan Naing
Irrawaddy: Wed 20 Aug 2008

More than 30 children have died in a famine in Chin state, western Burma, according to the Chin National Council, an exile rights group.

The famine was caused by a plague of rats, which ate rice stocks in many of the state's villages.

Another Chin group, the Chin Human Rights Organization, said the famine had hit about 20 percent of the state's population, or at least 100,000 people.

"They have no food," said Lian H Sakhong, a leader of the Chin Humanitarian and Relief Committee. "Unless we provide sufficient relief soon, the situation will become worse."

He pleaded with donors to contact the Chin Humanitarian and Relief Committee so that relief can be rushed to the stricken areas.

The famine occurs about every 50 years when the flowering of a native species of bamboo gives rise to an explosion in the rat population. The International Rice Research Institute has warned of "widespread food shortages" because of the crisis.


Voters and officials punished for 'No' votes
Democratic Voice of Burma: Tue 19 Aug 2008

Local officials in charge of areas that voted No in the constitutional referendum in May have been dismissed, while No voters have also faced retaliation from the authorities, local residents told DVB.

Officials in charges of some wards and villages in Katha, Sagaing division, where residents voted overwhelmingly against the military regime's proposed constitution, have been removed from their posts in the last month, according to local residents.

In Yenangyaung in Magwe Division, the authorities cut off the electricity supply and street lights in wards whose residents had voted against the constitution, while wards inhabited by the authorities and the pro-junta Union and Solidarity and Development Association members have been given 24-hour electricity.

Authorities have also been collecting lists of those who voted No to the referendum in other states and divisions.

The Burmese military government enacted its new constitution after referendums on 10 and 24 May which were marred by reports of intimidation, corruption and vote-rigging.

The regime claimed the constitution was approved by over 92 percent of voters, but is has been dismissed as a "sham" by pro-democracy groups and international commentators.


Myanmar natural gas sales up 25 percent
Associated Press: Tue 19 Aug 2008

Myanmar's natural gas sales soared nearly 25 percent to US$2.5 billion in the financial year through March, official statistics seen Tuesday said.

That's up from US$2.03 billion, the data from the Ministry of National Planning and Economic Development showed.

The ministry said natural gas sales constituted 40 percent of Myanmar's total commodities export revenue of US$6.4 billion in 2007-2008, with neighboring Thailand being the primary market.

Myanmar has exported natural gas since 1998 from its two major offshore gas fields in the Gulf of Martaban. Thailand uses the natural gas mainly to produce electricity.

Myanmar exported 515,689 million cubic feet (14,604 million cubic meters) of natural gas in 2007-2008 compared to 460,087 million cubic feet (13,029 cubic meters) the previous year.

Myanmar, ruled by the military government in 1988, faces economic sanctions by the United States and the European Union which hope to pressure the regime into improving its poor human rights record and hand over power to a democratically elected government.


Junta benefits from regional economic tug-of-war
Mizzima News: Tue 19 Aug 2008

India and ASEAN have announced that talks on services and investment are set to commence next month ahead of a comprehensive free trade agreement (FTA) to be signed later this year, according to Indian officials.

This latest step in deepening regional economic integration, with an Indian-ASEAN FTA hopefully to be finalized this December at ASEAN's Bangkok summit, is further evidence of an ever expanding matrix of competing regional economic interests, of which Burma finds itself at the heart of.

ASEAN, India and China are all working toward an expanded and interconnected web of economic relations – bilateral as well as multilateral – to be set in place by the first half of the next decade.

The agreement to undertake talks on services and investment between India and ASEAN comes two months after the signing of four additional economic pacts between the two entities, including the Bilateral Investment Promotion Agreement, and indicates India has little desire to stray from its Look East Policy.

China, India's regional hegemonic neighbor and rival, had previously reached an understanding with ASEAN over the services industry in January of 2007. China and ASEAN hope to have the world's largest FTA in working order by 2010 – though ASEAN's less developed countries, including Burma, are not slated to join till two years later.

While India and China continue to compete for favoritism with ASEAN as a bloc, they are also vying for supremacy in the arena of bilateral relations with members of the ten nation bloc.

Both India and China are pursuing plans to construct infrastructure linking India's northeast and China's Yunnan Province, respectively, with port facilities on Burma's west coast.

For ASEAN's part, in conjunction with further economic integration with the world's two most populist countries, it continues to strive for a FTA within the Southeast Asian consortium; the goal being the establishment of an ASEAN economic community by 2015.

The further entrenchment of the Burmese economy with that of its regional neighbors and partners continues to spoil the effectiveness of a United States led sanctions policy vis-à-vis the business interests of Burma's generals.

Fiscal Year 2006/2007 saw Burma generate eight billion dollars in foreign trade, the largest such figure since the countrywide unrest of the late 1980s.

ASEAN, China and India are Burma's three leading trading partners, with ASEAN accounting for over half of all foreign trade and transactions within Asia totaling over 90 percent of Burma's sum exchange.

However, despite the record eight billion dollars in foreign exchange for 2006/2007, it is still estimated that a third of Burma's citizens exist below the poverty line.

The initial ASEAN-India summit was held in 2002.


Myanmar exchange scam fleeces UN - Brian McCartan
Asia Times: Tue 19 Aug 2008

Myanmar's military junta has in recent months used a dual exchange rate regime to divert funds away from the humanitarian efforts overseen by the United Nations and other international aid agencies for the Cyclone Nargis disaster that struck the country in May.

The system valued the local currency, the kyat, at 20% to 25% less than the prevailing market rate, resulting in currency exchange losses that have ended up in the military regime's coffers.

The UN has suffered losses of at least US$1.56 million to the distorted exchange rate regime, while one senior UN official earlier estimated as much as $10 million had been lost. While the junta on Monday appeared to relax the system after news reports

spotlighted the diversion of funds meant for victims, the concession will likely fail to overcome donor concerns about the lack of transparency surrounding the humanitarian effort and increases the likelihood they will decline to come up with the $1 billion the UN, Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Myanmar government jointly estimated will be needed to rebuild devastated areas.

As the focus of the relief effort shifts from emergency aid to reconstruction, the UN and other aid agencies face the moral dilemma of how long they should continue working with a regime that is reviled in much of the world for its poor human rights record and negligence of the well-being of its own people. Unless the UN plans to source all of its rebuilding materials from abroad, it will soon become necessary for it to work hand-in-hand with government-approved businesses, many of which are known to bankroll the regime and some of which are under US and European economic and financial sanctions.

The UN is renowned for its ability to respond to disasters and coordinate relief efforts. Its agencies have similarly become notorious for their lack of oversight and controls that should ensure integrity of those same operations, blind spots that have already come to light with the dual exchange rate system and that will be a constant concern in working with a government Transparency International ranked last year as tied with Somalia as the world's most corrupt.

The Tripartite Core Group made up of the UN, ASEAN and the Myanmar government issued its post-cyclone needs assessment on July 21 at an ASEAN foreign ministers meeting in Singapore. The report estimated total damage from the cyclone at $4 billion and appealed to foreign donors for $1 billion for relief and reconstruction over a three-year period.

The report followed a second flash appeal to donors by the UN launched in New York on July 10, which called for $481 million for emergency relief and reconstruction. An additional $280 million was requested on top of the original $201 million earmarked to cover the first year of operations, including financial support for 13 UN agencies and 23 international non-governmental organizations involved in the effort.

The ruling generals, on the other hand, have contributed very little to the relief and reconstruction efforts. At the first flash appeal to foreign donors held in Yangon in late May, around three weeks after the disaster first hit, the junta requested $11.7 billion without a proper needs assessment. Critics claim this demand was simply based on the amount of foreign money Indonesia's Aceh received in the wake of the 2004 tsunami.

Since the first days after the May 2 cyclone, locals and analysts have noted an almost complete lack of assistance from the military apart from clearing major roads and, of course, for security. Aid sent from Thailand was shown disingenuously on state-run television relabeled as having come from senior generals themselves.

UN and regional dignitaries were taken on tours of model refugee camps, while thousands of other survivors received little or no relief. After two weeks of official inaction, the junta declared the relief phase over and began a mass relocation of people back to their villages in a cynical attempt to show the world that they had the situation under control.

See no evil

The UN has meanwhile downplayed the difficulties and restrictions its staffers have faced and continues to laud the junta for its collaborative spirit. UN officials have repeatedly announced their hopes the two sides can build on the current goodwill and expand into other future areas of cooperation. John Holmes, the UN's chief humanitarian relief official, estimated after his July trip to the worst-hit Irrawaddy Delta region that the relief effort would continue for another six months and the reconstruction period would likely last until April 2009.

Donors, including the US and United Kingdom, have, however, remained reluctant to pay the UN's bill and UN officials have complained they now face a funding crunch for their cyclone relief operations. An August 14 report by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Aid (OCHA) said that only $196.3 million had been received of the $1 billion appeal. That shortfall has resulted in curbs on activities.

The UN's World Food Program (WFP) announced in July that aid flights from Bangkok's Don Muang airport would be discontinued from August 10, citing that its three-month "rapid response" period ended on that date. The relief agency also withdrew two of five helicopters from Myanmar and said the remaining two would be pulled out in mid-November because of the expense. The WFP said restored water and roadways could now be used to move supplies, though some see this as spin-doctoring of the funding crunch that has dictated their scaled-back operations.

Countries with trade and financial sanctions against the junta, including the US and UK, are currently among the major aid providers, but this is expected to change when the relief phase ends and reconstruction begins. Once Myanmar is deemed able to domestically support its own reconstruction, the waivers now in place on transfers of funds and materials to Myanmar will likely be rescinded, especially as questions mount about how foreign funds have been funneled so far.

Donor concerns intensified with revelations in late July about the large windfall the junta had received through its grossly distorted dual exchange rate mechanism, where the official fixed exchange rate is around 6.4 kyat to the US dollar while the black market rate hovers around 1,100 kyat. Under Myanmar's foreign exchange rules, US dollars that enter the country must first be deposited in the state-owned Myanmar Foreign Trade Bank. Funds may then be withdrawn as Foreign Exchange Certificates (FECs), which are calculated at yet another rate of around 880 kyat to the dollar, and must be exchanged for kyat before they may be used.

The Myanmar Foreign Trade Bank is used by the UN, international NGOs and Burmese overseas remitting money back home. On his return from Myanmar in July, the UN's Holmes admitted that the relief effort was losing millions of dollars as a result of the regime's foreign exchange controls. "This is an extraordinary exchange loss, and where the gain goes, I'm not sure," he told reporters.

He went on to say that the issue had been raised in meetings on July 24 with the generals as a "significant problem". Prior to the May 2 cyclone, the kyat-to-FEC rate hovered between 960 or 980, but by late July that rate rose to 880 kyat while the kyat-US dollar black market rate was around 1,180. The FEC-dollar rate is stipulated by the government, and by forcing the UN and other aid agencies to exchange dollars for FECs before they may buy kyat the generals collect 220 kyat per dollar exchanged. That market distortion translated to a loss of 20%-25% on the FEC to kyat rate.

Passing mention

The issue was raised obliquely by the Tripartite Core Group in its July 18 assessment report, where it devoted a special box on page 23 to describe the dual exchange rate policy as it applied to the assessment of damages. The report noted that the official rate of 6.4 kyat to the dollar was used by the government and state-owned enterprises "primarily for accounting purposes" and that a market-determined rate was used for FECs.

It also noted a "parallel market" exists for exchanging US dollars into kyat and that the 1,100 kyat to the US dollar market rate was used to determine the damages accounted for in the report. However the analysis neatly passed over the government-mandated conversion to FECs by which the military regime collects a tidy 20%-25% premium over the market exchange rate. While the revelation is new to the international media and has the potential to upset donors, the system has been in place for over 15 years.

FECs were initially introduced by the government in 1993 to counter the higher rates offered by black market money changers over the government fixed rate used at banks and to take advantage of what the regime hoped would be a foreign currency windfall as more tourists traveled to the country. In the latest UN update on Cyclone Nargis relief efforts, Baker acknowledged that the UN had lost $1.56 million to the foreign exchange conversion system.

Losses incurred by the exchange controls should be qualified, however, since, according to Baker, much of the relief supplies are purchased overseas. He said, "We are not getting the full value of dollars donated for emergency relief, and donors are extremely worried and keen to see that this issue is resolved."

In apparent damage-control mode, an August 13 press release by the Tripartite Core Group announced that "humanitarian agencies are now invited to transfer payments to US dollar accounts of vendors for supplies and services". Myanmar Minister for National Planning and Economic Development U Soe Tha indicated that vendors would be under no obligation to convert dollars into FECs or the local currency. He went on to say that there was no obligation for international organizations to commission particular local vendors.

Despite these missteps and money lost, the UN continues to portray its relationship with the generals as one of increasing cooperation. On his return from Myanmar on July 24, Holmes said he was optimistic about the continuing relief effort. "We hope that the dialogue and cooperation built up in the last couple of months over the Cyclone Nargis response can be continued and improved, and in the future extended to other humanitarian issues as well," he said.

The Tripartite Core Group report significantly made no mention of the junta's slow response to the disaster, which was widely lamented as inadequate and callous by the international community. While the UN and international agencies are undoubtedly providing much needed assistance, reports from the Irrawaddy Delta indicate that there is still much room for improvement. While all cyclone-affected areas have by now received some assistance, the distribution has been highly uneven.

A small donor who returned from the region early last week noted that some remote villages he visited had only just received aid in the past week or two, nearly three months after the storm first hit on May 2. While Myanmar's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has granted 369 visas to foreign aid workers, obstacles remain in the form of time limits placed on visits to the delta and the necessity of seeking government permission to travel. Local Myanmar volunteers continue to be harassed and arrested for their relief activities.

Myanmar is estimated to have $3.5 billion in foreign reserves and receives an estimated $150 million per month from gas export revenues alone, according to a July 23 Human Rights Watch press release. Very little, if any, of this money appears to have gone towards relief and reconstruction. Instead the regime has squirreled away for itself at least $1.56 million through its distorted exchange rate system.

Meanwhile, affected farmers and local volunteers complain that officials now charge far above prevailing market rates for government supplies of seed and petrol. Fertilizers, pesticides and other farming inputs are often sold through businesses with strong ties to local government officials or the military, to which they often pay a concession to operate.

Larger companies with known links to the regime, including several that have been targeted by recent US sanctions, such as the Htoo Company and the Maung Weik Company, have already been contracted for reconstruction activities. Analysts suspect that they have accepted small-scale rehabilitation schemes in order to gain concessions for subsequent big-ticket infrastructure and property development projects the junta still hopes the donor community will finance.

* Brian McCartan is a Chiang Mai-based freelance journalist.



14 August 2008

 

[ReadingRoom] News on Burma - 14/8/08

  1. Monks given two-year prison term
  2. Fuel price protestors face new charges
  3. Delta villagers keen to work but lack necessary resources
  4. UN Human Rights Envoy cancels Press Conference
  5. Rape wrecking communities in Darfur, Myanmar
  6. Former ceasefire group to form political party for 2010 election
  7. Myanmar gem merchants dismiss US embargo threat
  8. Engagement vs. Divestment
  9. 20 Years since 1988 - Japanese Policy Betrays the Burmese People
  10. Aung San Suu Kyi detention extended
  11. Rights activist U Myint Aye arrested
  12. Devastation in Burma is far starker than portrayed
  13. Myanmar to export more marine products to Middle East
  14. Same old, same old
  15. Burmese must be supported
  16. Reflections on Burma's Uprising
  17. Many in Rangoon wear black on 8.8.88 anniversary
  18. Why US president met the Burmese at envoy's house

Monks given two-year prison term
Democratic Voice of Burma: Wed 13 Aug 2008

Nine monks arrested by authorities at Rangoon railway station last month have been sentenced to two years' imprisonment each on charges of bringing the Sasana into disrepute.

According to family members of political inmates in Insein prison, the monks were sentenced shortly after their arrests on 15 July.

"They were brought into a court hearing soon after they were arrested and then given a two-year sentence each," a family member said.

"Authorities detained the monks for gathering at the railway station but did not give any other reasons," he said.

"All the monks remained unidentified - no one knows their names, where they were from and who their lay supporters were."

The nine monks were arrested while waiting at the railway station to return to their monasteries for a retreat to mark Buddhist lent, according to a witness.

Insein prison was unavailable for comment.


Fuel price protestors face new charges
Democratic Voice of Burma: Wed 13 Aug 2008

Eight students and human rights activists arrested during protests against fuel price hikes last year have had five further charges added to their original charge of sedition, said their family members.

The student activists and Human Rights Defenders and Promoters network members will now be charged under sections 143, 145, 147, 295(a) and 505(b) of the penal code.

Sections 143, 145 and 147, which relate to unlawful assembly and rioting, carry a potential combined prison sentence of up to four and a half years, while 295(a) on offences against religion and 505(b) on inciting offences against public tranquility each carry a maximum two-year term.

Along with the possible three-year sentence for sedition, this means the defendants could now face up to 11 and a half years' imprisonment each.

Ma Thi Thi Soe, sister of HRDP member Ko Myo Thant (also known as John Nawtha), said her brother and his co-defendants - Ko Zin Linn Aung, Ko Sithu Maung, Ko Thein Swe, Ko Ye Myant Hein, Ko Ye Min Oo and Ko Kyi Phyu - heard the new charges against them during a hearing at Insein prison yesterday.

Ko Myo Thant went on a hunger strike in March to protest against violations of inmates' rights in Insein prison.


Delta villagers keen to work but lack necessary resources - Thet Khaing
Myanmar Times: Wed 13 Aug 2008

Shwe Pyi Aye village, located deep in the southern Ayeyarwady delta, was devastated by cyclone Nargis. Virtually all structures on the ground were destroyed and half the population were killed.

Despite the massive loss of life and property, three months after the disaster most of the village's 473 survivors are either back at work or are seeking sufficient financial support to resume their pre-cyclone economic activities.

As in many parts of the delta, the scale of destruction in Shwe Pyi Aye has not dampened the residents' enthusiasm for returning to work and getting on with their lives as quickly as possible. The only thing stopping many of them is lack of resources.

When a team of senior experts from the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) visited the village on July 29, residents had no shortage of ideas on how aid could best be used to restore livelihoods.

Among the ideas expressed at a meeting between villagers and UN experts was a suggestion to provide more assistance to large-scale farmers so that landless workers could earn daily wages.

Others said that locals should be supplied with boats and nets because fishing was the easiest way to earn a living in the area, and many were also keen for UNDP to resume a micro-credit scheme it had sponsored in the past.

"I don't want to live on assistance. I can still work to earn my living," said U Kyin Maung, 65, the lone survivor of a family of eight. His adult children had been running a grocery store in the village before the cyclone struck.

As an elderly person and the sole survivor of his family, U Kyin Maung was classified by UNDP as one of the most vulnerable of the village's survivors. He was granted K40,000 when the organisation started its assistance project in Shwe Pyi Aye six weeks after the cyclone.

U Kyin Maung used the money to open his own grocery store in a hut built on the site of his former house.

He said he buys food for his shop in Bogale, the nearest town to the village, but business has been slow because most locals have been left destitute by cyclone and therefore have little money to spend at his shop.

For now U Kyin Maung sells on credit to lure customers, most of whom live on small daily wages they get from their involvement in UNDP-sponsored cash-for-work schemes. He said he now earns about K500 a day, which he uses to pay living expenses.

"I feel lucky just to be alive," U Kyin Maung told The Myanmar Times last week. "I'm thankful to the government and aid agencies for providing emergency supplies of food and other relief items after the cyclone, otherwise we would all be dead of starvation."

"But we can't expect that to continue forever. We're not living in the desert. We have sufficient food resources all around us. We just need the tools to resume our work," he said.

Another Shwe Pyi Aye resident, 39-year-old U Kyaw Htoo, was also the sole survivor of a family of eight.

"I have tried to overcome the loss of my young children and elderly parents so I can resume my work," he said. "I've already finished planting paddy on 6 of the 9 acres on my farm."

A local social group called Ayeyarwady Thitsar helped U Kyaw Htoo plough his fields, and he used seeds and a power tiller provided by the government and UNDP for paddy growing.

"But a lack of sufficient fertilisers and the salinity conditions of the farmland could lead to lower paddy production than in previous years," he said, adding that he normally earns K2 million a year from his fields.

UNDP said it has given K7.1 million in cash assistance since the cyclone, including grants for rebuilding destroyed houses, daily wages for community work and fuel to operate power tillers.

Many locals have said they are afraid of similar disasters in the future and want at least one sturdy concrete building in the village where people can take shelter during storms.

The only building that survived the storm was the village monastery, where 110 people took refuge during the cyclone and survived.

UNDP categorised the work of rebuilding the infrastructure in Shwe Pyi Aye and other parts of the delta as a long-term initiative that will help locals build a better life than they had before the storm.

Mr Bishow Parajuli, the UNDP resident representative in Myanmar, pointed out in an interview with The Myanmar Times last week that his organisation has been involved for the past 14 years in human development initiatives supporting the improvement of life for rural residents.

"We have offices in many parts of the country and these have been our strength. We are applying that strength to the post-Nargis situation, principally by helping people regain their livelihoods and stand on their own feet, and by helping them increase their incomes and maintain their human dignity," he said.

He said UNDP also wants to resume offering micro-credit for poor rural residents in the delta, a project that was disrupted by the cyclone.

UNDP intends to write off nearly US$3 million in loans taken out by 50,000 borrowers, and refund US$1.25 million to the surviving 75,000 participants in the scheme living in cyclone-affected areas.

"All these efforts require extra resources," Mr Parajuli said, adding that his agency is seeking $52 million to help cyclone victims through next April.

The funding requirement - which is part of the appeal made by the UN last month for $482 million to help cyclone survivors - includes $8 million to restore the micro-credit scheme and expand it to increase the numbers of beneficiaries, he said.

"In the past several years UNDP has put $23 million into its micro-credit scheme and an very large number of these programs in the delta were affected by Nargis, so we are trying to renew that support by injecting additional money," Mr Parajuli said.

"Micro-credit is important because it helps individuals start small-scale activities and employment-generating schemes, whether they involve trade, land cultivation, animal husbandry or poultry," he said, adding that the expended micro-credit scheme in the delta will directly benefit 500,000 people.

"This will obviously have a big impact in terms of food security, families being able to get their kids back to school and establishing health facilities," Mr Parajuli said.

"Our goal is to complement various efforts by the government, the many national players and other UN agencies," he added.

Mr Parajuli, who is also the UN's resident coordinator in Myanmar, said he guaranteed that donor money would be put to the best possible use by providing benefits to the intended beneficiaries.

"The good part of the UNDP program is that our agency works directly with the communities, our resources are directly delivered to communities and we have a good understanding and cooperation with the government," he said

"We have full accountability of resources and we help communities to help themselves," he said.


UN Human Rights Envoy cancels Press Conference - Violet Cho
Irrawaddy: Wed 13 Aug 2008

The new UN Human Rights Special Rapporteur on Burma canceled a press conference in Bangkok on Wednesday, a sign that his first trip to Burma yielded little practical results, say activists.

Tomas Ojea Quintana arrived in Rangoon on August 3 on his mission to Burma and scheduled a press conference after he left Burma on August 7. No reason was given for the cancellation of the press conference.

During his trip in Burma, Quintana was not allowed to visit detained democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who is under house arrest. He was allowed short talks of about 10 minutes each with members of the National League of Democracy and Labour Minister Aung Kyi, the government's liaison coordinator with Suu Kyi.

Earlier, Quintana told the media he had received "good signs" that the Burmese junta accepted the need for his mandate to investigate widespread claims of human rights abuses in the country.

However, members of human rights groups said the special envoy may have cancelled the press conference because he achieved little progress in brief discussions with the military regime during his four-day visit to Rangoon.

"He probably cancelled his meeting with the press because he lacked real information about human right violations in Burma that he can share it with the public," said Maung Maung Lay, a member of Rangoon-based Human Rights Defenders and Promoters (HRDP).

In future visits, Quintana must be allowed to meet with more human rights groups and activists and not be confined to discussions with the military government, said Maung Maung Lay.

Bo Kyi, the joint secretary of the Assistance Association of Political Prisoners-Burma, who met with Quintana in Thailand, said, "As a new human rights envoy, Quintana must be very careful with everything he says. An opportunity to be able to enter Burma again depends a lot on what he says about the military regime."

Quintana replaced former UN Human Rights Special Rapporteur on Burma Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, whose appointment ended in April.

A few days after Quintana left the country, Burmese authorities seized prominent human rights activist Myint Aye of the HRDP and members of the National League for Democracy (NLD).

NLD spokesperson Nyan Win confirmed that Nyi Pu, chairman of the NLD Taunggok branch in Arakan State, and Dr Tin Min Htut, an elected member of parliament from Panthanaw constituency in Irrawaddy Division, were arrested on Tuesday morning. No reason for their arrests was given.

Recently, Nyi Pu and Dr Tin Min Htut had signed a public letter, along with other NLD members, to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urging the UN to reject the junta's constitution as illegitimate.

Nyi Pu's arrest came four days after the anniversary of the 1988 uprising. On Friday, authorities arrested 48 demonstrators who took part in a 1988 commemoration march in Rangoon. Forty-three marchers were released the same day. The remaining five are still in custody.


Rape wrecking communities in Darfur, Myanmar: Nobelists
Agence France Presse: Wed 13 Aug 2008

Rape is increasingly being used as a tool of war in ethnic conflicts in Darfur and Myanmar, wrecking families and communities, two women Nobel peace laureates warned Tuesday.

Jody Williams, who spearheaded a campaign banning antipersonnel landmines, and Wangari Maathai, an outspoken advocate for greater democracy in Africa, said women were paying "the highest price" in the violent conflicts.

The duo, accompanied by actress-activist Mia Farrow and other rights campaigners, visited clinics and refugee camps to hear first-hand the plight of women affected by the violence in the two areas.

"Unfortunately, in the ethnic cleansing being carried out by the Burmese military junta in eastern Burma, rape is being used as a tool of war, as it is in Darfur," Williams said, using Myanmar's former name Burma.

"The obvious purpose, in my view, is to destroy the fabric of the community. If the women are raped, they are obviously shamed in the eyes of their community. Often times the husbands divorce the women, who are left alone," she said.

Maathai said women were the first to be "victimised" in conflicts - "victimised by the fighters and then be victimised by the men that you love.

"It is very, very painful and for the women, it is pain you live with all your life.

"As for the girls, you can imagine the trauma and sometimes, I would look at the eyes of the women in the camp and just wonder whether she is one of those who was raped and what is going on in her heart and mind," Maathai said.

Within a camp in Chad sheltering refugees who fled the Darfur conflict in neighboring Sudan, Williams said she met with a group of about 30 to 40 women and "within the space of the hour that I had with them, I've heard of seven tell the stories of their gang rape.

"One woman was 35 years old and she had been raped by several of the Janjaweed (Arab militia in Sudan) and by the time she saw her husband, he already knew she was raped and he divorced her on the spot, leaving her with eight children," she said.

"Obviously, if you do this to enough communities, you destroy the family, you destroy the fabric of a community and if you do it throughout enough villages, you can shred the fabric of an ethnic group, which is what they are doing in Darfur and which is what they have done in the eastern part of Burma," she said.

According to the United Nations, up to 300,000 people have died and more than 2.2 million have fled their homes since the conflict erupted in Sudan's western Darfur region in February 2003.

It began when African ethnic minority rebels took up arms against the Arab-led Khartoum regime and state-backed Arab militias, fighting for resources and power in one of the most remote and deprived places on earth.

In Myanmar, rights groups charge the soldiers from the country's ruling military junta raped women in ethnic minority areas in an apparent bid to punish populations suspected of supporting insurgency groups.

Williams said a sister of a rape victim from Myanmar she spoke to in Thailand along the border with the military-run country was eager to complete her education so that she could return to help her people.

"This young woman was going to stand up and struggle for her sister, for her community, showing again the resilience in the face of such brutality which amazes me," she said.


Former ceasefire group to form political party for 2010 election - Hseng Khio Fah
Shan Herald Agency for News: Tue 12 Aug 2008

Shan Nationalities Peoples' Liberation Organization (SNPLO), a ceasefire group in southern Shan State that recently surrendered on 3 August under the pressure from the Burmese military has decided to form a state-based party to enter the 2010 elections, according to a source from anti-junta PaO National Liberation Organization (PNLO).

A group of 125 strong former SNPLO led by Soe Aung Lwin and Sein Shwe will form a political party, but the party's name has not been chosen so far, according to Joihto from PNLO's Political and Organization Department.

"However, we don't think the party will get a chance to win even though it is allowed to contest in the elections. Everything will be under the military control," he commented.

The group was forced to surrender and lay down all weapons by Deputy Commander of Eastern Region Command and Vice chairman of Shan State South Peace and Development Council, Brig-Gen Chit Oo and Military Affairs Security (MAS) officer, Major Win Bo.

The said officers led Light Infantry Battalion (LIB) 426 and Infantry Battalion (IB) 250 to surround the SNPLO's headquarters at Nawng Htao, Hsihseng township. Altogether 62 weapons of SNPLO were taken, Joihto told SHAN. "Had the group refused to comply, they would have been shot."

The Burmese military has since been stationed at Nawng Htao.

It is also reportedly planning to set up a new military camp and a police station at the former SNPLO headquarters.

The SNPLO was formed in 1968. In 1994 it concluded a ceasefire agreement with Rangoon. In 2007, one of its factions led by Chit Maung surrendered to the Burmese military and another faction led by KhunTi Sawng returned to the struggle changing its name to PaO National Liberation Organization (PNLO). The third faction led by Maj Hseng Fa surrendered last month.

Out of a ceasefire groups in Shan State, 3 have surrendered so far: Shan State National Army (SSNA) and Palaung State Liberation Army (PSLA) in 2005 and SNPLO this year. The remaining ceasefire groups are Kokang, Wa, Mongla, Shan State Army (SSA) North, Kachin Defense Army and PaO National Army (PNA).


Myanmar gem merchants dismiss US embargo threat
Associated Press: Tue 12 Aug 2008

Thousands of sapphires, rubies, diamonds, emeralds, jade and other gems glitter in long glass display cases as merchants haggle with professional buyers - most of them foreigners - and tourists.

Business is good here at the sales center of the Myanmar Gems Museum, despite legislation signed by President Bush last month to ban the import of rubies and jade into America. Yangon gem sellers dismissed the sanction against their government as a symbolic gesture unlikely to have much impact on their lucrative trade.

"Our buyers are almost all from China, Russia, the Gulf, Thailand, India and the European Union, and we can barely keep up with their demand," said Theta Mar of Mandalar Jewelry, a store in the museum gem shop, where prices range from a few hundred dollars to about $18,000 for the best rubies.

Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, produces up to 90 percent of the world's rubies and is a top international supplier of other gems and jade. The government-controlled sector, often criticized for harsh working conditions and poor environmental controls, is a major source of export revenue for the military.

No recent or reliable official statistics on the gemstone trade are publicly available, but analysts and human rights groups say it likely brings the military regime between $300 million and $400 million a year.

The embargo on gems is the latest U.S. move to apply financial pressure on the junta. Many Western nations have instituted economic and political sanctions against the military government, which seized power in 1988, violently suppressed pro-democracy demonstrations by monks last September and hindered foreign aid after a devastating cyclone in May.

The U.S. bill bans all import of gems from Myanmar. U.S. officials say Myanmar had been evading earlier gem-targeting sanctions by laundering the stones in third countries before they were shipped to the United States.

The United States also has been trying to persuade the U.N. Security Council to consider introducing international sanctions, and has demanded that the junta release opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest.

Exiled Myanmar pro-democracy activists hailed the new U.S. measure.

"This legislation sends a strong signal to Burma's military regime that the United States stands firmly on the side of my country's democracy movement," said Aung Din, co-founder of the Washington-based U.S. Campaign for Burma, which lobbies for political change.

However, the junta has not issued an official response. And local officials have privately told foreign diplomats the embargo will have no effect on the sector's foreign sales unless the wider international community joins in.

Such a move seems unlikely anytime soon. Although the European Union has edged closer to the punitive U.S. position toward Myanmar's military rulers, Yangon's regional trading partners - China, India and members of the Association of Southeast Asian States - have argued that engaging the junta will be more productive in the long run than isolating it through sanctions.

Foreign diplomats also have pointed out that sanctions would primarily impact disadvantaged minorities, who live in many of the gem mining areas of Myanmar.

So the gem trade continues to thrive. Myanmar's rubies, and particularly the rare "Pigeon Blood" stones, are highly prized on international markets because of their unique deep color. The country's precious jadeite deposits produce the dark green "Imperial Jade" that is sought-after in China and other countries in the region.

The junta holds regular gem auctions for foreign merchants during which it sells thousands of lots of valuable stones, which are said to generate upward of $100 million in foreign currency per sale. The last such event, held in November, drew more than 3,600 foreign buyers.

"We are not concerned (by the U.S. embargo)," Myint Myint Cho of the Min Thiha Jewelry Shop in downtown Yangon told a reporter. "We are not thinking of it at all."


Engagement vs. Divestment - Alyson Warhurst
Business Week: Tue 12 Aug 2008

Multinational corporations operating in such countries as Myanmar, Zimbabwe, and China are easy targets for critics who accuse them of supporting totalitarian regimes. Of course, business should be accountable. But it is a mistake to undermine a responsible company's reputation through ill-informed "trial by media." In fact, forcing companies to divest their holdings in these countries could ultimately harm the very people who most need help.

Private enterprise is one of the best ways to lift people out of poverty. Private-sector investment in emerging economies has risen fourfold during the past decade, outstripping official aid programs by 10 to 1. Government engagement with many regimes has been ineffective-failing, for example, to get timely relief into Myanmar, achieve a U.N. Security Council decision on Zimbabwe, or influence Chinese policy on Tibet or Darfur.

When things go wrong in such countries, responsible companies should be allowed to make business decisions for themselves. By continuing to operate, they can offer economic lifelines to employees and local communities and provide channels for engagement with civil society and governments-however much we disagree with the policies or actions of the latter.

THE BRAVE DECISION

Anglo American (AAL.L), the London-based mining company, faces pressure from human-rights groups and from the British government to pull out of Zimbabwe. With the Mugabe regime now threatening to strip the company of licenses it holds on undeveloped mining claims, the pressure has only increased.

Should it go? That would be a pity. Anglo American has been in Zimbabwe for 60 years and has extensive business and social networks. And it has a good reputation. Year after year, verified reports show it is a responsible employer and corporate citizen. If it withdraws, its employees would suffer and its networks would crumble, reducing opportunities for business engagement with future governments. And if Anglo American leaves, the Mugabe government would seek investment from others-notably, from Russian and Chinese mining companies, which may have lower human-rights standards and lack transparency.

Not all companies make the brave decision to stay. British retailer Tesco (TSCO.L), after critics targeted it in a media campaign, announced on July 1 that it would no longer source products from Zimbabwe. Its Zimbabwean supply chain supported an estimated 4,000 workers. What happens to them now? Zimbabwe's economy is in shambles, pushing an estimated 5 million to the brink of starvation.

Rival retailers Waitrose and Sainsbury's (SBRY.L) continue to source from Zimbabwe. Mining company Rio Tinto (RIO.L), banking group Standard Chartered (STAN.L) and consumer-products giant Unilever (ULVR.L) still do business there. All are responsible companies.

If prices are fair, wages are just, working conditions are decent, transactions are transparent, and community initiatives are sustainable, should we not trust responsible global businesses to stay, so long as they operate by the principles we have asked them to adopt?

HUMANITARIAN PARTNERS

In Myanmar, divestment has had disastrous consequences. Under pressure from critics, such apparel makers as Adidas (ADSG.F) and Levi Strauss & Co. have closed factories or stopped sourcing from the country. Thousands who lost their jobs were women. Left impoverished and isolated, many have had no alternative but to join the country's growing number of sex workers. Surely, that is not what the critics intended.

Britain's Premier Oil (PMO.L) also left Myanmar partly under pressure. At the time of leaving, it had implemented programs to provide training in human-rights monitoring to the military and to government employees. It also financed community investment projects, managed by Save the Children USA, that are among the best-run such programs I have ever evaluated. And it had engaged with opposition leader Aung San Sui Kyi, who agreed that responsible business would have a critical role to play in rebuilding the country when democracy returned.

The business vacuum in Myanmar was highlighted in May when the country was hit by a devastating cyclone. Around the world, responsible businesses often work with humanitarian partners to deliver relief after natural disasters. Having such networks in place could have made a big difference in Myanmar, whose ruling junta initially refused assistance from the U.N. and Western countries. Instead, a handful of companies, including French oil group Total and express-delivery company DHL, found themselves battling the odds to deliver humanitarian relief via their limited channels. If Western business had stayed and maintained a diligent approach to human rights, thousands might now have decent jobs, to the benefit of their families and communities.

BOUNDARIES OF RESPONSIBILITY

China presents a different kind of dilemma. Unlike Zimbabwe and Myanmar, there's little chance that multinationals will leave this booming economy. Yet with the Beijing Olympic Games about to begin, top corporate sponsors are in the spotlight.

One example is General Electric (GE). As the official Olympics provider of water treatment services, it recently announced it would donate two treatment systems to provide clean drinking water for more than 60,000 residents in Dongguang City and its environs. GE says the project "will strengthen our ability to further help China and other nations leapfrog traditional infrastructure challenges to deliver clean water to hundreds of millions of people in the world's remote communities." Such initiatives, which apply the company's core competencies to address sustainable development, clearly show why responsible business should be encouraged to engage with governments, even when we disagree with those governments on human-rights issues.

GE is also working with other companies, including Honeywell (HON), United Technologies (UTX), and IBM (IBM), to help the Chinese government design and install one of the most comprehensive public surveillance systems in the world. The system, which will be deployed at Olympic venues and in the subway and airports, uses GE's powerful VisioWave technology, which automatically alerts security personnel to suspicious and fast-moving objects.

Clearly, protection of Olympic athletes and visitors is paramount. However, it's not hard to imagine that the Chinese authorities, with their well-documented track record of detaining journalists, lawyers, activists, and religious practitioners, could use this technology to infringe on citizens' rights. This underlines the need for responsible business. GE has as its overarching goal for 2008 implementing human-rights considerations in GE's operating cycles. In line with this, Bob Corcoran, vice-president for corporate citizenship, says GE "secured the US export licenses and worked with the Chinese customer to make sure that the equipment is used for its intended purpose, during and after the Olympics."

PART OF THE SOLUTION

How far should the boundaries of corporate responsibility extend? There are no easy answers. But responsible business clearly has a role to play in high-risk emerging economies. Across-the-board divestment makes neither economic sense nor humanitarian sense. Companies, if they stay, can become part of the solution by following these recommendations:

  • Develop business principles based on the U.N. Global Compact
  • Establish a human-rights policy supported by training and monitoring systems and empowering of local managers.
  • Create an ethical supply-chain management system.
  • Work with expert third parties to audit activities and suppliers.
  • Engage on human-rights dilemmas and solutions with internal and external stakeholders.
  • Build relationships with employees and address humanitarian flash points, such as hunger or disasters.
  • Develop sustainable social investment programs with employees' families and local communities.
  • Engage in dialogue with host governments to promote transparency.
  • Build trust with home-country government and avoid communicating with politicians via the media.
  • Communicate regularly with civil society organizations and the media in Europe and the U.S.

Warhurst is chair of Strategy and International Development at Britain's Warwick Business School, a member of the faculty of the World Economic Forum, and a founding director of social enterprise and advisory firm Maplecroft. She has advised companies including De Beers, Shell, DHL, TNT, Unilever, Nestle Waters, Premier Oil, and Standard Chartered Bank, as well as international humanitarian and human rights organizations on global risks and corporate social responsibility.


20 Years since 1988 - Japanese Policy Betrays the Burmese People - Benedict Rogers
Nikkan Berita (Japan): Tue 12 Aug 2008

Twenty years ago on August 8, 1988, thousands of Burmese pro-democracy demonstrators were slaughtered by their country's military regime in a massacre known as "8888″. Since then, Burma's illegal junta has intensified its grip on power, and continued its crimes against humanity. In doing so, it has been assisted by the Japanese government. August 8, 2008 was also the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games in Beijing. China has been the major ally of Burma's military regime, providing arms, investment and diplomatic cover. As Japanese people tune in to watch the Games, they should ponder the question: is it not time their government reconsidered its policy toward the Burmese regime, and put pressure on China to stop protecting these thugs?

Since 1988 Burma's political and humanitarian crisis has only got worse.

Over 2,000 political prisoners are in jail, subjected to daily torture. Burma's democracy leader, Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, remains under house arrest. The Burmese army has the highest proportion of forcibly conscripted child soldiers in the world. Since 1996, over 3,200 villages in eastern Burma have been destroyed by the military in a campaign of ethnic cleansing that targets civilians. Rape is deployed as a weapon of war, forced labour is widespread and people are used as human minesweepers. Over a million people are internally displaced, on the run in the jungle without food, medicine or shelter. Millions more have fled across Burma's borders into exile.

In 1990, Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy (NLD) overwhelmingly won elections, but has never been permitted to take up its rightful place in government. Instead, many elected representatives from the pro-democracy movement have been jailed or exiled. Last September, in a repeat of the massacre 20 years ago, Buddhist monks courageously led peaceful protests - and were once again gunned down. Japanese photo-journalist Kenji Nagai was among those killed.

Cyclone Nargis struck Burma in May this year and caused great destruction. Prior to the cyclone, the regime received over 40 warnings from Indian meteorologists, but failed to notify residents in the Irrawaddy Delta. As the scale of the devastation became clear, the international community rushed to offer assistance, but the regime had the audacity to refuse offers of international aid. It eventually relented, but imposed heavy restrictions. Since then the military rulers obstructed and diverted aid for their own purposes, and now stand accused of stealing millions of dollars from UN aid money through foreign exchange mechanisms. Over 2.5 million people are still homeless, a million people have received no help, and the death toll exceeds 130,000. In the face of such criminal negligence, Japan has said nothing.

Despite the devastation caused by the cyclone, the junta went ahead with its sham referendum on a new constitution, declaring a 99% turnout and claiming that 92.4% voted for the constitution. What did Japan do? Senior Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs, Hitoshi Kimura, said that the fact that Japanese embassy staff were able to observe the poll, albeit in just a few polling stations, "made it a good opportunity from the point of view of improvement of transparency."

It is difficult to imagine a more absurd position. The referendum law made it illegal to campaign against the constitution or even criticize it. Opponents were subject to a jail sentence of at least three years. Moreover, Buddhist monks and nuns, numbering 500,000, were denied the vote, as were religious leaders from other faiths. Millions in the conflict areas, 700,000 Muslim Rohingyas, and millions of refugees in exile were excluded. Further, the junta rejected international monitors. There are widespread reports of vote rigging, harassment, intimidation and bribery. Most people who voted yes did so not out of belief but from fear. Ballot papers were easily identifiable - so the regime could scrutinise how people had voted, and punish those who voted no. In some areas, the army and local officials cast votes on behalf of people. To hold a referendum days after a cyclone was not just callous, it was a blatant sign that the junta had no intention of holding a free vote. Yet still, Japan stayed silent.

An official in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) told me earlier this year that Japan's priority is to preserve its relations with the junta in Burma. Such a policy is not sustainable. Japan's policy on Burma is not just a betrayal of the Burmese people, but of the liberal democratic values on which modern Japan is built.

It is time for Japan to turn up the heat on the junta and end its deafening silence. The constitution, which enshrines military rule and lacks legitimacy, should be rejected. Japan should support efforts through the UN to impose meaningful benchmarks for progress in democratic reform and a universal arms embargo. In addition, with Tokyo being Asia's financial center, Japan should consider introducing financial sanctions targeting the assets and transactions of the generals. Japan could also support bringing a case to the International Criminal Court, charging the generals with crimes against humanity. The Japanese people must urge their government to awaken its moral senses.

Benedict Rogers is a writer and human rights activist and has made over 20 visits to Burma and its borderlands. He works for the human rights organization Christian Solidarity Worldwide, and is Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party Human Rights Commission in the UK. He is the author of A Land Without Evil: Stopping the Genocide of Burma's Karen People (2004, Monarch Books) and a new report recently launched in Japanese, Carrying the Cross: The military regime's campaign of restriction, discrimination and persecution against Christians in Burma.


Aung San Suu Kyi detention extended
CNN International: Mon 11 Aug 2008

Myanmar's military rulers have extended the house arrest of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi for another year, a source who spoke to a member of her political party told CNN on Monday.

The junta's decision will keep Aung San Suu Kyi under detention for more time than the county's law allows. She has already been under house arrest for four and a half years, and the maximum limit is five years without charges being filed.

The pro-democracy leader met with her attorney Sunday to discuss legal issues, the source told CNN.

Aung San Suu Kyi won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991. She has become the face of the pro-democracy movement in Myanmar and the focus of a global campaign to free her.

The junta has confined Aung San Suu Kyi in her home for 12 of the last 18 years. Her latest house arrest began in 2003 and has been periodically renewed.

The country last held multiparty elections in 1990, but the regime ignored the results, which showed Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party posting a landslide victory.

Last year, the government came under intense international pressure after using force to suppress a pro-democracy movement. In late May, Myanmar state media said voters had overwhelmingly approved a draft constitution that strengthens the junta's rule.

At the time, New York-based Human Rights Watch said it had received indications that the referendum was conducted "in an atmosphere of official coercion and vote tampering."

The military government refused international or independent referendum monitors and UN assistance in conducting the voting, the group said.

And the balloting was conducted amid a humanitarian crisis in the Irrawaddy Delta and other regions devastated when Cyclone Nargis made landfall in Myanmar in early May.

About 130,000 people either died or are missing, according to the United Nations. And more than 2 million have been rendered homeless.

The draft constitution makes way for general elections in 2010, but it has been met with skepticism from pro-democracy opposition leaders. The changes grant 25 percent of parliamentary seats to the military. It also states that the president can cede power to the military during a state of emergency.


Rights activist U Myint Aye arrested - Yee May Aung
Democratic Voice of Burma: Mon 11 Aug 2008

U Myint Aye, a prominent member of the Human Rights Defenders and Promoters network, was arrested at his house in Kyi Myint Taing township on 8 August, according to his family.

U Myint Aye's wife Ma Leh Leh said township police chief U Myat Linn and divisional investigation police deputy chief U Kyaw Htin, accompanied by ward authorities, arrived at the house at around 4pm on Friday, the 20th anniversary of the 1988 national uprising in Burma.

"They searched the house until around 6.30pm and then they took him away," said Ma Leh Leh.

"There was heavy rain that day and our house was yet not fully sheltered from it due to damage to the roof - but they thoroughly searched the whole house."

Leh Leh said the officials seized several items and documents belonging to U Myint Aye.

"They seized some appeal letters for donations sent to us by Cyclone Nargis victims - they usually send us these so that we know what they need," she said.

This was the eighth time U Myint Aye has been arrested and his whereabouts are still unknown, his wife said.

"They never let us know where he's been taken, for what reason or how long will it be, even when we ask - I've got used to this and so I didn't bother to ask them this time," Ma Leh Leh said.

She said Kyi Myint Taing police chief U Aung Ngwe Soe and the ward authorities came to their house again the next day and took some of U Myint Aye's clothes.


Devastation in Burma is far starker than portrayed
Associated Press: Mon 11 Aug 2008

A rare bird's-eye look at Burma's Irrawaddy delta shows the devastation still left from Cyclone Nargis - broken levies, flooded farm roads, the shattered remains of bamboo huts, and trees strewn like matchsticks along the coast.

Conditions are far starker than reflected in assessments from Burma's government and in the optimism of some UN officials, the Associated Press has concluded from a review of data, a private flight over the delta, and interviews with victims and aid workers.

Three months after a disaster that claimed nearly 140,000 lives, thousands of villagers are still getting little or nothing from their government or foreign aid groups.

"We lost everything - our house, our rice, our clothes. We were given just a little rice by a private aid group from Rangoon. I don't know where the government or foreign organizations are helping people, but not here," said Khin Maung Kyi, 60, a farmer who lost six children to the storm.

Some areas have received help in the delta, Burma's rice bowl set amid a lacework of waterways. During a flyover, brand new metal roofs atop reconstructed homes glittered in the tropical sunlight, farmers in cone-shaped hats worked in green rice paddies, and gangs of workers struggled to remove debris from canals and repair broken embankments.

But progress is slow and behind where it should be.

"The situation in Myanmar remains dire," said Chris Kaye, who heads relief operations for the UN World Food Program in Burma, which the military junta refers to as Myanmar. "The vast majority of families simply don't have enough to eat."

Some grim recent statistics from foreign aid agencies working in the delta:

A survey of families in 291 villages indicated that 55 percent had less than one day of food left and no stocks to fall back on. About 924,000 people will need food assistance until the November rice harvest, while about 300,000 will need relief until April 2009.

The fishing industry, the delta's second most important source of income and food, remains devastated. More than 40 percent of fishing boats and 70 percent of fishing gear were destroyed and very little has been replaced.

More than 360,000 children will not be able to go to elementary school in coming months because at least 2,000 schools were so badly damaged they cannot reopen soon.

"The vast majority of people have received some assistance. But very few people have received enough assistance to get them through the next three months, and almost no one has received enough assistance to enable them to rebuild their lives," said Andrew Kirkwood, who heads the aid agency Save the Children in Burma.

Kirkwood said three months after such a disaster, aid agencies would normally be rebuilding schools, health clinics, and other facilities. But in Burma, he said, the first phase of emergency distribution of food and basics is likely to continue for another three months.

More upbeat assessments have come from other quarters. Some have noted that a second wave of death from disease and starvation anticipated by some relief agencies never occurred.

"It has gone much better than anyone expected," said Ashley Clements, a spokesman for World Vision, an international Christian relief and development agency, citing the resilience of the victims and the speed of the aid response.

"The message I want the world to know is that the government, UN agencies, and other organizations . . . are making good progress," said Ramesh Shrestha, a UN representative in Rangoon.

Almost at the same time the UN humanitarian news service, IRIN, published a report about conditions in the delta titled "Life is totally bleak." Chronicling the plight of several families, it noted that many people lack food and shelter. Some foreign aid workers caution that their agencies refrain from exposing problems for fear the government will curb or halt their access to victims.

"Our operations are contingent on having a positive relationship with the government," Kaye said. "So we have to work out a fine balance, so that the difficult issues are dealt with, but in a spirit of cooperation."


Myanmar to export more marine products to Middle East
Xinhua: Mon 11 Aug 2008

Myanmar is making increased efforts to penetrate the Middle East market with its marine products by making use of Kuwait as a transit point, the local Flower News reported Sunday.

To boost its marine product exports to the region, Myanmar has coordinated with a Kuwaiti economic delegation, who accompanied Prime Minister Sheik Nasser Al-Mohammed Al-Ahmed Al-Jaber Al-Sabah in the latter's recent visit to Myanmar.

On that occasion, the two countries signed three accords including two agreements on encouragement and reciprocal investment protection, and economic and technical cooperation, and a memorandum of understanding on establishing consultation between the two foreign ministries.

Myanmar has been exporting the marine products to Arab countries in the Middle East transiting through Kuwait as well as exporting them to other countries in the region such as Qatar, Jordan and the United Arab Emirate directly.

According to the report, Myanmar exported 43,640 tons of such products to the Middle East in 2007-08 which ended in March, gaining 50.99 million U.S. dollars.

The figures was up from 26,409 tons in 2004-05 when it earned 29.5 million dollars.

Of the marine product exports to the Middle East, Kuwait accounted for 27,895 tons alone with 30.63 million dollars' proceeds.

Official statistics show that in 2007-08, Myanmar exported 352, 652 tons of marine products, gaining 561 million U.S. dollars, up from 2006-07's 234 million dollars.

The fishery authorities have projected to raise the export earning to 850 million dollars in the present fiscal year of 2008-09.

China topped Myanmar's marine export countries, followed by Thailand, Japan and Singapore.

Myanmar's fishery sector stood the fourth largest contributor to the gross domestic product and also the fourth largest source of foreign exchange earning in the past five years.

Meanwhile, Myanmar is cooperating with a regional organization of the Southeast Asia Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC) in conducting survey of marine resources in the country's waters, focusing species with commercial potential.

With a long coastline of over 2,800 kilometers and a total area of 500,000 hectares of swamps along the coast, the country has an estimated sustainable yield of marine products at over 1 million tons a year.


Same old, same old - A. Asohan
Malaysia Star: Mon 11 Aug 2008

Myanmar's ruling junta is hoping that its on-going human rights violations will become a non-issue, but let's keep flogging this dead horse.

TWENTY years and two days ago, student activists in a little-known South-East Asian country stood up for democracy against their oppressive, tyrannical government.

People from all walks of life - civil servants, professionals, monks and plain old ordinary folk - all demanding democratic reform, soon joined them.

The military stepped in, and according to most news reports, gunned down thousands of these peaceful marchers.

The people stood firm however, and finally got their way. Two years later, the country held its first general election in decades, and a pro-reformation party won it hands-down. A new era beckoned.

Except that it didn't. The military rulers declared the election null and void, slapped cuffs on the democratic leaders, and carried on their merry, violent way.

And the world looked on. Twenty years and two days later, the world is still looking on.

Oh sure, governments may issue a few verbal slaps on the wrists once in a while as a salve to their conscience - some even going so far as rapping knuckles - but they're still only looking on.

Two days ago, while large parts of Asia celebrated the auspicious triple-fatt (08-08-08) or anticipated Olympic glory, people in cities across the world - as far away as San Francisco and London, and right here at home in Kuala Lumpur - marched peacefully in remembrance of the quadruple eight or "8888 Uprising" of Aug 8, 1988.

Coordinating their efforts via websites, alternative news portals, blogs and social media networks such as Facebook, many people across the world are still trying to keep Myanmar (or Burma) on the table of public discourse.

"Actually, for a problem like Burma, which seems so complex, the solution can be surprisingly simple - if only governments and the United Nations stopped talking so much and started doing more," says K.P. Lee, a Malaysian journalist who has spent much of his working life as an activist.

Governments could turn the situation around right now, if they really wanted.

"What we are seeing in Burma today is a totally avoidable, man-made disaster caused by a particularly nasty regime, but this regime survives only because it is propped up by Asean's impotence, China's money and India's weapons.

"That's the great tragedy, and a huge frustration," says the 42-year-old.

The United States and Britain saw fit to invade a sovereign country to save its millions from the tyranny of one dictator, going against international rule of law and the United Nations to do so. (Yes, I know, they first said it was because Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was a hotbed of Al-Qaeda activity; they only changed their tune after their leaders' lies were exposed.)

Nobody would dispute that the belligerent Saddam Hussein had committed horrific crimes against humanity. But his repressive government had also provided some basic amenities and infrastructure (most of which were destroyed by the invading forces) to the people.

Compare that with the abominations going on in Myanmar, where most of the population are under the poverty line, where government troops carry out state-sanctioned mass murders and gang rapes (against children too), and Iraq under Saddam seems like a model state.

Myanmar's military junta is financing its genocide of tribes like the Karen with money made from trade. Governments allowing this to happen are still peddling the fantasy that some of the proceeds trickle down to the masses, despite all evidence to the contrary.

If I hear anyone say "constructive engagement" again, I'll puke.

That was Asean's excuse for getting involved with Myanmar's repressive regime. Let economic prosperity open the door to democratic reform.

In 2005, there was a movement to deny Myanmar the Asean chair. The movement was led by ordinary citizens, activists, NGOs and even some politicians, all of whom had acknowledged that Asean's "constructive engagement" gambit had failed miserably.

The movement found expression with tributes across the world on the 60th birthday of Myanmar's "Lady Liberty" herself, the Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, leader of the National League for Democracy that won the 1990 election, and is therefore the country's rightful Prime Minister.

In a column I wrote then, I quoted Kraisak Choonhavan, a senator who had been leading this movement in Thailand: "When you see villages marked for relocation, state-sanctioned mass murder, gang rapes, disappearances and torture, you have a moral obligation not to engage that government in business."

It's now three years later, and Suu Kyi just celebrated her 63rd birthday still under house arrest.

Governments are still pussyfooting around the issue, declaring as victories the fact that the Myanmar regime allowed some international aid - and only some, mind you - to go through to the victims of the devastating Cyclone Nargis earlier this year.

Asean officials even praised the regime's efforts, despite on-the-ground reports from international relief workers condemning the ruling junta's slow response.

Earlier this year, at a meeting in Singapore, Myanmar finally ratified the Asean charter that will see it subject to certain rules, including those on human rights.

Given that it had promised democratic reforms when it first joined the regional grouping all those years ago, then never bothered keeping those promises, it will be interesting to see what would happen now if it breaches the terms of the charter.

Will Asean finally summon the cojones to act?

Or perhaps we should just stop expecting governments to do, you know, government-ish stuff like that.

While what's going on in Myanmar is frustrating and heart-breaking, journalist Lee sees hope in what he calls a "quiet revolution."

"Many Burmese groups, working 'underground' and under dangerous conditions, are changing the way people think. They are teaching people about their rights, what to expect from a government, about democracy, economics, security … they are working to empower them.

"Many very brave people, including youths and women, are learning and then sharing this information in towns and remote areas all around the country.

"That's a key part to changing Burma, I feel. Ultimately it has to come from within. I feel hopeful for Burma because when - and not if - democracy comes, the people will be ready," he says.

* A. Asohan, New Media Editor at The Star, is too riled up to say anything whimsical in this footnote.


Burmese must be supported - Michael Martin
Irish Times: Mon 11 Aug 2008

TWENTY YEARS ago, in a remarkable display of "people power", hundreds of thousands of Burmese citizens took to the streets of their country in peaceful demonstrations to demand democracy, justice and economic security in their troubled land, a struggle that they have been engaged in ever since.

It was in these post-8-8-88 (August 8th, 1988) weeks that a small, quiet, middle-aged woman emerged on to the national stage. The daughter of the hero of Burma's struggle for independence, Gen Aung San, who had been assassinated when she was two, and of a mother who was a distinguished Burmese ambassador, Aung San Suu Kyi had spent much of her life outside her native land but she had returned to Burma in March 1988 to nurse her terminally-ill mother.

Known little beyond being the daughter of her hero father and with no track record as a practising politician, Aung San Suu Kyi became involved almost immediately on her return in the pro-democracy wave sweeping the country. Exactly one week after the Burmese people took to the streets on August 8th, Aung San Suu Kyi issued an open letter to the regime, proposing the appointment of an independent People's Consultative Committee to lead the country into multi-party elections, and also stressing to the people of Burma the vital importance of discipline and non-violence in their search for justice and change.

On August 26th, Aung San Suu Kyi made the first major public appearance of her career at a political rally in Rangoon, addressing a rapturous crowd of around half a million, and presenting a political programme based on human rights, democracy and non-violence.

But on September 18th, the 8-8-88 popular and peaceful uprising and the weeks of hope and elation that followed were brought to a rapid end when the army chief-of-staff staged a military coup to regain control of the government. Martial law was immediately imposed and control of the country was transferred to a State Law and Order Restoration Council. Along with this, the army launched a merciless counteroffensive against the demonstrators, unleashing the full might of the military on unarmed civilians - men, women and children. At a minimum, 3,000 died or disappeared without trace, but some would claim that the number could have been as high as 10,000.

Undeterred by the crackdown, Aung San Suu Kyi and other members of the opposition founded a political party on September 24th - the National League for Democracy, or NLD, and she became its general secretary. By then, Aung San Suu Kyi, in defiance of bans on public meetings and in the face of serious threats to her personal safety, had already begun to organise a series of more than a hundred political rallies around the country, attended by growing crowds of supporters.

In April 1989 while campaigning in the Irrawaddy Delta, Aung San Suu Kyi - in one of the most iconic scenes of her career - marched calmly through an army unit with rifles trained on her. However, in July, increasingly alarmed by her growing influence and popularity, the regime placed Aung San Suu Kyi under house arrest in Rangoon where she has remained for most of the years since then.

But despite her house arrest and heavy restrictions on her, Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD scored a resounding victory in elections in May 1990, with her party securing 82 per cent of the seats. The military junta refuses to recognise the results of the election and have continued to rule the country ever since, changing its name to Myanmar. It is a ruthless military regime that has distinguished itself primarily for its brutal repression of the people of Burma, military campaigns against ethnic minorities and the generation of vast numbers of refugees and internally-displaced people. It is the same regime that last September brutally crushed the peaceful protests of unarmed monks and civilians demonstrating peacefully.

It is a regime which, in the wake of the tragedy engendered by Cyclone Nargis in May, proceeded with an already flawed and discredited referendum and did virtually nothing to help the survivors, until forced into action by the international community.

Unfortunately the international response to the situation in Burma has been inadequate, though to their credit the European Union, the United States and some other countries have imposed political and economic sanctions on the regime in the wake of their rejection of the results of the 1990 election; these were tightened further following the events of last September. Although sanctions have not resulted in any change of heart on the part of the regime, they serve as an important symbol of our rejection of that brutal regime and all that it stands for.

The Burmese generals have also resisted any effective role by the UN and international human rights bodies, though the personal intervention of the UN secretary general in the post-cyclone situation and visits by other key UN representatives provide some grounds for optimism for a more proactive UN role. I would, of course, very much welcome this.

Ireland, along with our EU partners, has long worked hard to maintain the issue of Burma high on the international agenda. The Government works closely with like-minded international partners seeking ways to generate more effective global action in support of the Burmese people. We hope that their role in the post-Nargis relief and reconstruction effort can be developed into more proactive political engagement.

Over the years, the Government and the Irish people have provided assistance to the Burmese people and their acknowledged representatives, including responding quickly and generously to the recent humanitarian crisis. Likewise, we work closely with the Burmese community and friends of Burma in Ireland, including supporting the excellent work of Burma Action Ireland. We also maintain close working relations with the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma - Burma's government in exile.

Today, we remember the heroic actions of the people of Burma in 1988. We recognise in particular that, despite all that they have suffered, the spirit of 8-8-88 lives on in the hearts and minds of the people of Burma, at home and in exile. In paying tribute today to those brave men and women, and especially to their leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, the Government will continue to do all that is possible in support of their unwavering desire for freedom, justice and democracy.

Micheál Martin is Minister for Foreign Affairs


Reflections on Burma's Uprising - Min Zin
Far Eastern Economic Review: Mon 11 Aug 2008

Twenty years have now passed since Burma started its struggle for democracy in what is famously known as the "8-8-88 Movement." It was a nationwide uprising calling for the removal of the military dictatorship and a restoration of the democratic government.

Back in 1988, I was a 14-year-old high school student. Two of my older siblings had been arrested and tortured for their involvement in the initial student protests and another brother was expelled from school. This shocked our whole family.

It was then that my political activism began. We distributed pamphlets and leaflets in our schools, staged hit-and-run protests in neighborhoods afterwards, and contacted other high schools and went together to universities to join their protests. Later on I became one of the founding leaders of the nation-wide high school student union in Burma, a place where unions are illegal and just being a member of one could result in long-term imprisonment.

It was these student-led protests that eventually snowballed into a nationwide popular uprising on August 8, 1988 (8-8-88).

However, the military staged a coup on September 18 and responded with bullets. When the troops started firing on protesters that night, I was with hundreds of fellow high-school students in Rangoon, participating in a hunger strike. In the following days, I found myself in the thick of the shootings and saw students killed before my very eyes. According to independent estimates, at least 10,000 people were killed in the August and September of 1988.

Even in the aftermath of the crackdown, I still felt awed and shocked. I reflected hard on what had happened. We had stood for principles of truth and justice and the whole population had supported us. So why hadn't we succeeded? It was a question that took me a while to answer.

After the military coup, I continued to engage in clandestine political activities for reform with other political leaders, including Aung San Suu Kyi, who has become an icon of the Burmese democracy movement. Because of my activities, the military intelligence arrived at my house to arrest me on July 18, 1989. Since I was not at home, they arrested my father instead.

Despite being hunted by the military and threatened with the imprisonment, death and harassment of my family, I decided not to give up and went underground. This is where, despite moving from place to place, I remained for more than eight years.

As time passed, especially during my time on the run, evading arrest, I came to resolve my confusion and realize that though it is important to stand up for one's principles in politics, principle alone cannot guarantee political victory. Political activists need to understand what distinguishes the principled who succeed from the principled who fail. The common complacency about being on the 'right' side actually accomplishes little unless coupled with a sound strategy for achieving concrete goals. Our idealism even runs the risk of blinding activists from what is actually happening, and, when push comes to shove, may leave them stranded in irrelevance.

In this way, the central reason for the failure of 1988 uprising was that the opposition did not provide the leadership to "close the deal." When the street protests reached their highest peak in late August through September 18, the government had become defunct. The opposition leadership, however, would fail to take advantage of the emerging power vacuum. Neither did they unify themselves to push for regime change, nor did they negotiate a transition of power.

After I fled to the Thai border in late 1997, I decided that journalism was the best way for me to support Burma's pro-democracy movement, since it allowed me to reach people inside Burma as well a growing international audience which follows Burma's affairs. In time, my perspective has also broadened and I have been more and more convinced that the Burmese opposition has no "end game" strategy. They have often confused the means-mass movements-with the ends-victory itself-and in doing so failed to achieve the intended result when protests actually reached their peak. This lack of planning was shown again in last September's demonstrations.

The fact that we are still unable to translate principle into victory is more than frustrating for me, since it always comes with unspeakable costs. More than ten thousand peaceful protesters have been killed since the 1988 uprising and about two thousand political prisoners, including my brother, remain in jail. Moreover, the plight of the ethnic minorities under the military's oppression has been immeasurable in its cruelty.

But, despite all this, a specific memory keeps me going, something from the 8-8-88 uprising. When we were marching during the 1988 democracy movement, most of us had nothing to eat. Yet some in the crowd would make rice bags for us so that we could keep marching. When we collected those rice bags, we would promise them, "you will get democracy one day".

Yet I have not kept my promise.

Whenever I feel dejected by the lack of progress, I tell myself that I must fulfill the promise that I gave to my people-I owe them for the rice bags I ate. This is a very simple thing, but it has kept those feelings of responsibility for all these years. The rice bags I received 20 years ago still give me power and energy to keep going on.

* Min Zin is a Burmese journalist in exile.


Many in Rangoon wear black on 8.8.88 anniversary - Min Lwin
Irrawaddy: Fri 8 Aug 2008

Many Rangoon residents donned black clothing to mark Friday's 20th anniversary of 1988 uprising, and noticeably more police and plainclothes security personnel were seen on city streets.

Members of Burma's opposition National League for Democracy held a commemorative rally in Yenangyaung Township, Magwe Division, and food offerings were made at eight of the city's monasteries to mark the occasion. Offerings were also made at monasteries in Rangoon.

Although security was tightened in Rangoon and other centers, no arrests were reported on Friday. The previous day, however, the authorities arrested Myo Teza, a leader of the All Burma Federation of Students' Unions, and two of his colleagues.

Students at Rangoon University reported tightened security at the campus, where entry was restricted to two gates. University staff had reportedly been warned not to tolerate any political activity by their students.

In a statement marking the anniversary, the 88 Generation Students Group urged the Burmese military government to release all political prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi and ethic leaders and to begin talks with Suu Kyi. The statement repeated the group's rejection of the regime's plan to hold a general election in 2010.

In several cities around the world, including in such Asia countries as Thailand, Malaysia, Japan and South Korea, anti-regime protesters held anniversary demonstrations in front of Burmese and Chinese embassies.


Why US president met the Burmese at envoy's house - Thanida Tansubhapol
Bangkok Post: Fri 8 Aug 2008

It was no secret that US President George Bush wanted to meet Burmese dissidents during his stay in Bangkok. The process was secretly and carefully arranged, given the sensitivity of the issue, which could have affected Thailand's relations with Burma. After delivering his speech at the Queen Sirikit National Convention Centre and visiting the Mercy Centre in nearby Klong Toey, Mr Bush rushed back to the residence of US ambassador to Thailand Eric John on Wireless road. The ambassador's house had been chosen as the venue for his meeting with 11 Burmese dissidents, where they discussed the political situation in their country and what role Washington should play in ending the Burmese military's rule.

The Burmese stayed overnight in Bangkok to prepare for their key meeting with the US leader, who made it clear in his speech that he is determined to restore democracy to Burma. The Burmese stayed at the Landmark Hotel before being moved to the ambassador's residence, a Burmese source said.

The meeting with Mr Bush was timely given it was held on the eve of the 20th anniversary of the Aug 8, 1988 bloodshed when the Burmese military cracked down on pro-democracy activists.

All the Thai officials responsible for protocol were excluded from this arrangement. There was a reason for their exclusion. The US knew the Thai government did not want the talks to be held in a way that would give Rangoon the impression Bangkok was involved.

The Thai government did not allow the US to use any hotel as a venue for the talks, the same source said.

Using the US ambassador's residence or the US embassy in Bangkok was the perfect way out because those two venues are US territory. The government can say it had no involvement in the meeting because it was not held on Thai territory.



Archives

September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   September 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   July 2011   August 2011   October 2011  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?